Bath & Body Works, Inc. (BBWI) vs Steven Madden, Ltd. (SHOO)
A side-by-side comparison of Bath & Body Works, Inc. and Steven Madden, Ltd. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
BBWI
Bath & Body Works, Inc.
$17.93Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
SHOO
Steven Madden, Ltd.
$45.58Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — BBWI vs SHOO
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yBBWI -61.0% (-9.0%/yr)SHOO +128.4% (+8.6%/yr)SHOO compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
BBWI SHOO
BBWI vs SHOO: by the numbers
- •BBWI is the larger company ($3.61B vs $3.33B market cap).
- •BBWI trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (4.78 vs 22.79 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •BBWI converts more revenue to profit (10.83% vs 5.23% net margin).
- •SHOO grew revenue faster over the past five years (13.41% vs -5.75% CAGR).
- •BBWI pays the higher dividend yield (4.46% vs 1.85%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BBWI | SHOO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 4.78 | 22.79 |
| Forward P/E | 6.62 | 20.68 |
| P/S ratio | 0.50 | 1.22 |
| P/B ratio | N/A | 3.55 |
| EV / EBITDA | 5.21 | 15.25 |
| FCF yield | 28.53% | 6.55% |
Profitability
| Metric | BBWI | SHOO |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 44.12% | 46.06% |
| Operating margin | 16.74% | 7.40% |
| Net margin | 10.83% | 5.23% |
| ROE | N/A | 15.25% |
| ROIC | 24.92% | 11.45% |
Dividends
| Metric | BBWI | SHOO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 4.46% | 1.85% |
| Payout ratio | 21.33% | 42.00% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BBWI | SHOO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -5.75% | 13.41% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -11.29% | N/A |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -12.79% | 24.39% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -20.07% | 4.44% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, BBWI or SHOO?
- BBWI has the lower trailing P/E: BBWI trades at 4.78 and SHOO at 22.79. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, BBWI or SHOO?
- Over the past five years, SHOO grew revenue faster — BBWI at a -5.75% CAGR versus SHOO at 13.41%.
- Does BBWI or SHOO pay a bigger dividend?
- BBWI yields 4.46% and SHOO yields 1.85% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is BBWI or SHOO more profitable?
- BBWI runs the higher net margin — BBWI at 10.83% versus SHOO at 5.23%.
- How have BBWI and SHOO total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, BBWI delivered -8.01% and SHOO delivered 8.36% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Bath & Body Works P/E ratioSteven Madden P/E ratioBath & Body Works dividend yieldSteven Madden dividend yieldBath & Body Works ROESteven Madden ROEBath & Body Works operating marginSteven Madden operating marginBath & Body Works revenue growthSteven Madden revenue growthBath & Body Works free cash flowSteven Madden free cash flow
Bath & Body Works & Steven Madden appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.