Bath & Body Works, Inc. (BBWI) vs Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT)
A side-by-side comparison of Bath & Body Works, Inc. and Liquidity Services, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 2, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
BBWI
Bath & Body Works, Inc.
$16.06Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
LQDT
Liquidity Services, Inc.
$43.23Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — BBWI vs LQDT
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yBBWI -59.6% (-8.7%/yr)LQDT +334.2% (+15.8%/yr)LQDT compounded faster over this window
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
BBWI LQDT
BBWI vs LQDT: by the numbers
- •BBWI is the larger company ($3.24B vs $1.35B market cap).
- •BBWI trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (4.28 vs 42.38 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •BBWI converts more revenue to profit (10.83% vs 6.79% net margin).
- •LQDT grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.03% vs -5.75% CAGR).
- •BBWI pays a dividend (4.95% yield), while LQDT has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BBWI | LQDT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 4.28 | 42.38 |
| Forward P/E | 5.93 | 23.49 |
| P/S ratio | 0.45 | 2.75 |
| P/B ratio | N/A | 5.72 |
| EV / EBITDA | 4.95 | 20.89 |
| FCF yield | 31.85% | 6.68% |
Profitability
| Metric | BBWI | LQDT |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 44.12% | 46.56% |
| Operating margin | 16.74% | 9.00% |
| Net margin | 10.83% | 6.79% |
| ROE | N/A | 14.10% |
| ROIC | 24.92% | 11.85% |
Dividends
| Metric | BBWI | LQDT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 4.95% | N/A |
| Payout ratio | 21.33% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BBWI | LQDT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -5.75% | 15.03% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -11.29% | N/A |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -12.79% | 9.39% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -21.90% | 15.02% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, BBWI or LQDT?
- BBWI has the lower trailing P/E: BBWI trades at 4.28 and LQDT at 42.38. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, BBWI or LQDT?
- Over the past five years, LQDT grew revenue faster — BBWI at a -5.75% CAGR versus LQDT at 15.03%.
- Does BBWI or LQDT pay a bigger dividend?
- BBWI pays a dividend (4.95% yield), while LQDT has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is BBWI or LQDT more profitable?
- BBWI runs the higher net margin — BBWI at 10.83% versus LQDT at 6.79%.
- How have BBWI and LQDT total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, BBWI delivered -8.78% and LQDT delivered 14.53% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Bath & Body Works P/E ratioLiquidity Services P/E ratioBath & Body Works dividend yieldBath & Body Works ROELiquidity Services ROEBath & Body Works operating marginLiquidity Services operating marginBath & Body Works revenue growthLiquidity Services revenue growthBath & Body Works free cash flowLiquidity Services free cash flow
Bath & Body Works & Liquidity Services appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 2, 2026.