Which has grown faster, BAX or UHS?

Over the past five years, UHS grew revenue faster — BAX at a -1.22% CAGR versus UHS at 8.21%.

Does BAX or UHS pay a bigger dividend?

BAX yields 0.16% and UHS yields 0.46% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is BAX or UHS more profitable?

UHS runs the higher net margin — BAX at -9.27% versus UHS at 8.42%.

How have BAX and UHS total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, BAX delivered -4.50% and UHS delivered 4.34% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Baxter International Inc. (BAX) vs Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS)

A side-by-side comparison of Baxter International Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 10, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

BAX

Baxter International Inc.

$12.54B

$24.26HealthcareDelayed quote: Sep 10, 2026, 10:30 AM EDT

UHS

Universal Health Services, Inc.

$10.49B

$173.21HealthcareDelayed quote: Sep 10, 2026, 10:30 AM EDT

Total return — BAX vs UHS

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

BAX -37.4% (-4.6%/yr)UHS +50.2% (+4.2%/yr)UHS compounded faster over this window

BAX UHS

BAX vs UHS: by the numbers

•BAX is the larger company ($12.54B vs $10.49B market cap).
•UHS is profitable (8.42% net margin) while BAX runs a net loss (-9.27%).
•UHS grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.21% vs -1.22% CAGR).
•UHS pays the higher dividend yield (0.46% vs 0.16%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	BAX	UHS
P/E ratio	N/A	7.10
Forward P/E	11.81	7.69
P/S ratio	1.09	0.58
P/B ratio	2.02	1.40
EV / EBITDA	29.54	5.78
FCF yield	5.41%	7.88%

Profitability

Metric	BAX	UHS
Gross margin	30.08%	90.69%
Operating margin	-2.39%	11.36%
Net margin	-9.27%	8.42%
ROE	-17.13%	20.31%
ROIC	-1.61%	11.74%

Dividends

Metric	BAX	UHS
Dividend yield	0.16%	0.46%
Payout ratio	N/A	3.28%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BAX	UHS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-1.22%	8.21%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	16.19%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-12.92%	-12.18%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-19.93%	3.74%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, BAX or UHS?: Over the past five years, UHS grew revenue faster — BAX at a -1.22% CAGR versus UHS at 8.21%.
Does BAX or UHS pay a bigger dividend?: BAX yields 0.16% and UHS yields 0.46% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is BAX or UHS more profitable?: UHS runs the higher net margin — BAX at -9.27% versus UHS at 8.42%.
How have BAX and UHS total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, BAX delivered -4.50% and UHS delivered 4.34% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full BAX analysis Full UHS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Universal Health Services P/E ratio Baxter International dividend yield Universal Health Services dividend yield Baxter International ROE Universal Health Services ROE Baxter International operating margin Universal Health Services operating margin Baxter International revenue growth Universal Health Services revenue growth Baxter International free cash flow Universal Health Services free cash flow

Baxter International & Universal Health Services appear in these rankings

Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 10, 2026.