Baxter International Inc. (BAX) vs Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS)
UHS leads on 13 of 14 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Baxter International Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 20, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
BAX
Baxter International Inc.
$22.07HealthcareDelayed quote: Jul 20, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
UHS
Universal Health Services, Inc.
$150.64HealthcareDelayed quote: Jul 20, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — BAX vs UHS
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30yBAX +247.8%UHS +2842.8%UHS compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
BAX UHS
BAX vs UHS: by the numbers
- •BAX is the larger company ($11.40B vs $9.43B market cap).
- •UHS is profitable (8.56% net margin) while BAX runs a net loss (-9.70%).
- •UHS grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.63% vs -0.86% CAGR).
- •BAX pays the higher dividend yield (0.88% vs 0.53%).
Which is better, BAX or UHS?
Metric tally: BAX 1 · UHS 13It depends on what you're optimizing for:
GrowthUHS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeBAX(higher dividend yield)
QualityUHS(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BAX | UHS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | — | 6.34 |
| Forward P/E | 11.76 | 6.45● |
| P/S ratio | 1.03 | 0.53● |
| P/B ratio | 1.93 | 1.24● |
| PEG ratio | — | 0.26 |
| EV / EBITDA | 28.78 | 5.37● |
| FCF yield | 6.13% | 9.59%● |
Profitability
| Metric | BAX | UHS |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 30.11% | 90.45%● |
| Operating margin | -2.65% | 11.50%● |
| Net margin | -9.70% | 8.56%● |
| ROE | -18.17% | 20.19%● |
| ROIC | -1.79% | 11.29%● |
Dividends
| Metric | BAX | UHS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.88%● | 0.53% |
| Payout ratio | — | 3.42% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BAX | UHS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -0.86% | 8.63%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | — | 16.19% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -10.81% | -4.64%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -21.22% | 0.19%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, BAX or UHS?
- It depends on your goal. growth: UHS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: BAX (higher dividend yield); quality: UHS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, UHS leads 13 to 1.
- Which has grown faster, BAX or UHS?
- Over the past five years, UHS grew revenue faster — BAX at a -0.86% CAGR versus UHS at 8.63%.
- Does BAX or UHS pay a bigger dividend?
- BAX yields 0.88% and UHS yields 0.53% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is BAX or UHS more profitable?
- UHS runs the higher net margin — BAX at -9.70% versus UHS at 8.56%.
- Which has been the better investment, BAX or UHS?
- Over the past 10-year, UHS delivered the higher annualized total return — BAX at -5.75% versus UHS at 1.46%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Baxter International P/E ratioUniversal Health Services P/E ratioBaxter International dividend yieldUniversal Health Services dividend yieldBaxter International ROEUniversal Health Services ROEBaxter International operating marginUniversal Health Services operating marginBaxter International revenue growthUniversal Health Services revenue growthBaxter International free cash flowUniversal Health Services free cash flow
Baxter International & Universal Health Services appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 20, 2026.