Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (BAM) vs Truist Financial Corporation (TFC)
BAM leads on 7 of 12 compared metrics, though TFC is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. and Truist Financial Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 28, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
BAM
Brookfield Asset Management Ltd.
$44.62Financial Services
TFC
Truist Financial Corporation
$50.49Financial Services
Total return — BAM vs TFC
growth of $100 · last 4yBAM +39.4%TFC +9.2%BAM compounded faster
BAM TFC
BAM vs TFC: by the numbers
- •BAM is the larger company ($71.25B vs $62.90B market cap).
- •TFC trades at the lower earnings multiple (12.98 vs 28.97 P/E).
- •BAM converts more revenue to profit (52.33% vs 18.14% net margin).
- •BAM grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.43% vs 5.16% CAGR).
- •BAM pays the higher dividend yield (4.50% vs 4.12%).
Which is better, BAM or TFC?
Metric tally: BAM 7 · TFC 5It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueTFC(lower P/E)
GrowthBAM(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeBAM(higher dividend yield)
QualityBAM(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BAM | TFC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 28.97 | 12.98● |
| Forward P/E | 25.20 | 11.11● |
| P/S ratio | 15.10 | 2.10● |
| P/B ratio | 9.49 | 1.00● |
| PEG ratio | 2.15 | 0.86● |
Profitability
| Metric | BAM | TFC |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 71.84%● | 62.92% |
| Operating margin | 63.13%● | 21.35% |
| Net margin | 52.33%● | 18.14% |
| ROE | 32.88%● | 8.61% |
| ROIC | 14.45%● | 3.61% |
Dividends
| Metric | BAM | TFC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 4.50%● | 4.12% |
| Payout ratio | 130.52% | 53.89% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BAM | TFC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 16.43%● | 5.16% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | — | 4.42% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | — | 2.41% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, BAM or TFC?
- It depends on your goal. value: TFC (lower P/E); growth: BAM (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: BAM (higher dividend yield); quality: BAM (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, BAM leads 7 to 5.
- Is BAM or TFC cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, TFC is cheaper: BAM trades at a 28.97 P/E and TFC at 12.98.
- Which has grown faster, BAM or TFC?
- Over the past five years, BAM grew revenue faster — BAM at a 16.43% CAGR versus TFC at 5.16%.
- Does BAM or TFC pay a bigger dividend?
- BAM yields 4.50% and TFC yields 4.12% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is BAM or TFC more profitable?
- BAM runs the higher net margin — BAM at 52.33% versus TFC at 18.14%.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Brookfield Asset Management P/E ratioTruist Financial P/E ratioBrookfield Asset Management dividend yieldTruist Financial dividend yieldBrookfield Asset Management ROETruist Financial ROEBrookfield Asset Management operating marginTruist Financial operating marginBrookfield Asset Management revenue growthTruist Financial revenue growthBrookfield Asset Management free cash flowTruist Financial free cash flow
Brookfield Asset Management & Truist Financial appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 28, 2026.