Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (BAM) vs VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH)

Over the past 3 years, BAM lagged SMH — 17.19% vs 54.17% annualized total return (price plus dividends).

A side-by-side comparison of Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. and VanEck Semiconductor ETF across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 8, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total returnBAM vs SMH

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 4y
BAM +80.9% (+16.0%/yr)SMH +438.1% (+52.3%/yr)SMH compounded faster over this window
100200300400500600Start $1002023202420252026$181$538
BAM SMH

Metrics side by side

Did BAM beat SMH?

Over the past 3 years, BAM lagged SMH — 17.19% vs 54.17% annualized total return (price plus dividends).

Total return (annualized)

MetricBAMSMH
Total return (1Y)-10.85%96.31%
Total return CAGR (3Y)17.19%54.17%
Total return CAGR (5Y)N/A33.71%
Total return CAGR (10Y)N/A33.97%

SMH is an index fund, so valuation, profitability, and per-company growth metrics don't apply — the head-to-head here is total return (price plus reinvested dividends).

Frequently asked

Has BAM beaten SMH?
Over the past 3 years, BAM lagged SMH — 17.19% vs 54.17% annualized total return (price plus dividends).

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 8, 2026.