Which has the lower trailing P/E, BAM or MET?

MET has the lower trailing P/E: BAM trades at 26.65 and MET at 18.85. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, BAM or MET?

Over the past five years, BAM grew revenue faster — BAM at a 16.43% CAGR versus MET at 2.19%.

Does BAM or MET pay a bigger dividend?

BAM yields 3.98% and MET yields 2.39% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is BAM or MET more profitable?

BAM runs the higher net margin — BAM at 51.60% versus MET at 4.61%.

Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (BAM) vs MetLife, Inc. (MET)

A side-by-side comparison of Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. and MetLife, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

BAM

Brookfield Asset Management Ltd.

$73.20B

$45.84Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Sep 15, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

MET

MetLife, Inc.

$63.20B

$98.22Financial ServicesDelayed quote: Sep 15, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — BAM vs MET

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 4y

BAM +69.0% (+14.0%/yr)MET +43.7% (+9.5%/yr)BAM compounded faster over this window

BAM MET

BAM vs MET: by the numbers

•BAM is the larger company ($73.20B vs $63.20B market cap).
•MET trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (18.85 vs 26.65 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•BAM converts more revenue to profit (51.60% vs 4.61% net margin).
•BAM grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.43% vs 2.19% CAGR).
•BAM pays the higher dividend yield (3.98% vs 2.39%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	BAM	MET
P/E ratio	26.65	18.85
Forward P/E	24.66	9.80
P/S ratio	13.55	0.80
P/B ratio	1.57	2.31

Profitability

Metric	BAM	MET
Gross margin	70.20%	36.36%
Operating margin	60.60%	6.19%
Net margin	51.60%	4.61%
ROE	5.99%	13.27%

Dividends

Metric	BAM	MET
Dividend yield	3.98%	2.39%
Payout ratio	109.30%	44.53%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BAM	MET
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	16.43%	2.19%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	9.24%	-3.45%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	N/A	13.18%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, BAM or MET?: MET has the lower trailing P/E: BAM trades at 26.65 and MET at 18.85. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, BAM or MET?: Over the past five years, BAM grew revenue faster — BAM at a 16.43% CAGR versus MET at 2.19%.
Does BAM or MET pay a bigger dividend?: BAM yields 3.98% and MET yields 2.39% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is BAM or MET more profitable?: BAM runs the higher net margin — BAM at 51.60% versus MET at 4.61%.

Go deeper

Full BAM analysis Full MET analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Brookfield Asset Management P/E ratio MetLife P/E ratio Brookfield Asset Management dividend yield MetLife dividend yield Brookfield Asset Management ROE MetLife ROE Brookfield Asset Management operating margin MetLife operating margin Brookfield Asset Management revenue growth MetLife revenue growth

Brookfield Asset Management & MetLife appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.