Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (BAM) vs BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT)

A side-by-side comparison of Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. and BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 10, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total returnBAM vs BGT

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 4y
BAM +68.9% (+14.0%/yr)BGT +50.1% (+10.7%/yr)BAM compounded faster over this window
100150200Start $1002023202420252026$169$150
BAM BGT

BAM vs BGT: by the numbers

  • BAM is the larger company ($75.46B vs $328M market cap).
  • BGT converts more revenue to profit (73.11% vs 51.60% net margin).
  • BAM grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.43% vs 1.46% CAGR).
  • BGT pays the higher dividend yield (13.17% vs 3.98%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricBAMBGT
P/E ratio27.48N/A
Forward P/E25.29N/A
P/S ratio13.96N/A
P/B ratio1.620.99

Profitability

MetricBAMBGT
Gross margin70.20%84.12%
Operating margin60.60%90.60%
Net margin51.60%73.11%
ROE5.99%7.53%

Dividends

MetricBAMBGT
Dividend yield3.98%13.17%
Payout ratio109.30%N/A

Growth (annualized)

MetricBAMBGT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)16.43%1.46%
EPS CAGR (5Y)9.24%43.50%
Total return CAGR (5Y)N/A6.66%

Frequently asked

Which has grown faster, BAM or BGT?
Over the past five years, BAM grew revenue faster — BAM at a 16.43% CAGR versus BGT at 1.46%.
Does BAM or BGT pay a bigger dividend?
BAM yields 3.98% and BGT yields 13.17% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is BAM or BGT more profitable?
BGT runs the higher net margin — BAM at 51.60% versus BGT at 73.11%.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 10, 2026.