Is BALL or LULU cheaper?

On trailing earnings, LULU is cheaper: BALL trades at a 16.52 P/E and LULU at 9.62.

Which has grown faster, BALL or LULU?

Over the past five years, LULU grew revenue faster — BALL at a 2.41% CAGR versus LULU at 17.61%.

Does BALL or LULU pay a bigger dividend?

BALL pays a dividend (1.40% yield) while LULU does not currently pay one.

Is BALL or LULU more profitable?

LULU runs the higher net margin — BALL at 6.87% versus LULU at 13.03%.

Which has been the better investment, BALL or LULU?

Over the past 10-year, BALL delivered the higher annualized total return — BALL at 5.59% versus LULU at 5.35%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Ball Corporation (BALL) vs Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU)

LULU leads on 12 of 16 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Ball Corporation and Lululemon Athletica Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

BALL

Ball Corporation

$15.17B

$56.98Consumer Cyclical

LULU

Lululemon Athletica Inc.

$13.49B

$118.77Consumer Cyclical

Total return — BALL vs LULU

growth of $100 · last 19y

BALL +347.6%LULU +748.4%LULU compounded faster

BALL LULU

BALL vs LULU: by the numbers

•BALL is the larger company ($15.17B vs $13.49B market cap).
•LULU trades at the lower earnings multiple (9.62 vs 16.52 P/E).
•LULU converts more revenue to profit (13.03% vs 6.87% net margin).
•LULU grew revenue faster over the past five years (17.61% vs 2.41% CAGR).
•BALL pays a dividend (1.40% yield) while LULU does not currently pay one.

Which is better, BALL or LULU?

Metric tally: BALL 4 · LULU 12

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueLULU(lower P/E)

GrowthLULU(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityLULU(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	BALL	LULU
P/E ratio	16.52	9.62●
Forward P/E	14.23	10.71●
P/S ratio	1.12●	1.22
P/B ratio	2.72●	2.84
PEG ratio	1.25	0.40●
EV / EBITDA	10.49	5.81●
FCF yield	3.91%	9.33%●

Profitability

Metric	BALL	LULU
Gross margin	15.69%	55.70%●
Operating margin	9.17%	18.21%●
Net margin	6.87%	13.03%●
ROE	16.73%	30.25%●
ROIC	7.83%	22.70%●

Dividends

Metric	BALL	LULU
Dividend yield	1.40%	—
Payout ratio	24.02%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BALL	LULU
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	2.41%	17.61%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	13.22%	24.02%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	8.30%●	7.36%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-5.68%●	-18.88%

Frequently asked

Which is better, BALL or LULU?: It depends on your goal. value: LULU (lower P/E); growth: LULU (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: LULU (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, LULU leads 12 to 4.
Is BALL or LULU cheaper?: On trailing earnings, LULU is cheaper: BALL trades at a 16.52 P/E and LULU at 9.62.
Which has grown faster, BALL or LULU?: Over the past five years, LULU grew revenue faster — BALL at a 2.41% CAGR versus LULU at 17.61%.
Does BALL or LULU pay a bigger dividend?: BALL pays a dividend (1.40% yield) while LULU does not currently pay one.
Is BALL or LULU more profitable?: LULU runs the higher net margin — BALL at 6.87% versus LULU at 13.03%.
Which has been the better investment, BALL or LULU?: Over the past 10-year, BALL delivered the higher annualized total return — BALL at 5.59% versus LULU at 5.35%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full BALL analysis Full LULU analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Ball P/E ratio Lululemon Athletica P/E ratio Ball dividend yield Lululemon Athletica dividend yield Ball ROE Lululemon Athletica ROE Ball operating margin Lululemon Athletica operating margin Ball revenue growth Lululemon Athletica revenue growth Ball free cash flow Lululemon Athletica free cash flow

Ball & Lululemon Athletica appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.