Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) vs The Timken Company (TKR)
A side-by-side comparison of Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation and The Timken Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 2, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
BAH
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
$67.35IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
TKR
The Timken Company
$122.44IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — BAH vs TKR
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yBAH +176.0% (+10.7%/yr)TKR +318.8% (+15.4%/yr)TKR compounded faster over this window
BAH TKR
BAH vs TKR: by the numbers
- •TKR is the larger company ($8.51B vs $8.10B market cap).
- •BAH trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (10.56 vs 33.18 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •BAH converts more revenue to profit (7.01% vs 5.43% net margin).
- •BAH grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.05% vs 4.20% CAGR).
- •BAH pays the higher dividend yield (3.44% vs 1.16%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BAH | TKR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 10.56 | 33.18 |
| Forward P/E | 10.59 | 19.51 |
| PEG ratio | 1.10 | 16.51 |
| P/S ratio | 0.73 | 1.79 |
| P/B ratio | 6.74 | 2.66 |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.58 | 13.24 |
| FCF yield | 13.78% | 4.53% |
Profitability
| Metric | BAH | TKR |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 20.91% | 28.67% |
| Operating margin | 9.51% | 11.19% |
| Net margin | 7.01% | 5.43% |
| ROE | 64.73% | 8.10% |
| ROIC | 15.99% | 6.64% |
Dividends
| Metric | BAH | TKR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.44% | 1.16% |
| Payout ratio | 36.36% | 38.48% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BAH | TKR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 7.05% | 4.20% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 9.45% | 1.79% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 17.83% | -2.29% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -1.66% | 14.13% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, BAH or TKR?
- BAH has the lower trailing P/E: BAH trades at 10.56 and TKR at 33.18. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, BAH or TKR?
- Over the past five years, BAH grew revenue faster — BAH at a 7.05% CAGR versus TKR at 4.20%.
- Does BAH or TKR pay a bigger dividend?
- BAH yields 3.44% and TKR yields 1.16% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is BAH or TKR more profitable?
- BAH runs the higher net margin — BAH at 7.01% versus TKR at 5.43%.
- How have BAH and TKR total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, BAH delivered 9.84% and TKR delivered 15.20% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Booz Allen Hamilton P/E ratioTimken P/E ratioBooz Allen Hamilton dividend yieldTimken dividend yieldBooz Allen Hamilton ROETimken ROEBooz Allen Hamilton operating marginTimken operating marginBooz Allen Hamilton revenue growthTimken revenue growthBooz Allen Hamilton free cash flowTimken free cash flow
Booz Allen Hamilton & Timken appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 2, 2026.