Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (BAH) vs Fluor Corporation (FLR)
BAH leads on 10 of 14 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation and Fluor Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
BAH
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation
$62.68Industrials
FLR
Fluor Corporation
$53.62Industrials
Total return — BAH vs FLR
growth of $100 · last 16yBAH +214.3%FLR -2.4%BAH compounded faster
BAH FLR
BAH vs FLR: by the numbers
- •FLR is the larger company ($7.49B vs $7.24B market cap).
- •BAH trades at the lower earnings multiple (9.08 vs 27.22 P/E).
- •BAH converts more revenue to profit (7.57% vs 2.30% net margin).
- •BAH grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.38% vs 1.92% CAGR).
- •BAH pays a dividend (3.64% yield) while FLR does not currently pay one.
Which is better, BAH or FLR?
Metric tally: BAH 10 · FLR 4It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueBAH(lower P/E)
GrowthBAH(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityBAH(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BAH | FLR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 9.08● | 27.22 |
| Forward P/E | 10.32● | 20.67 |
| P/S ratio | 0.67 | 0.62● |
| P/B ratio | 6.85 | 3.29● |
| PEG ratio | 0.25● | 1.25 |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.05 | — |
| FCF yield | 12.56% | — |
Profitability
| Metric | BAH | FLR |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 44.51%● | -1.63% |
| Operating margin | 9.21%● | -3.40% |
| Net margin | 7.57%● | 2.30% |
| ROE | 76.83%● | 12.19% |
| ROIC | 18.60%● | 1.84% |
Dividends
| Metric | BAH | FLR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.64% | — |
| Payout ratio | 33.00% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BAH | FLR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 7.38%● | 1.92% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 9.45% | 40.81%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 8.54%● | 6.28% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -5.32% | 23.65%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, BAH or FLR?
- It depends on your goal. value: BAH (lower P/E); growth: BAH (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: BAH (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, BAH leads 10 to 4.
- Is BAH or FLR cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, BAH is cheaper: BAH trades at a 9.08 P/E and FLR at 27.22.
- Which has grown faster, BAH or FLR?
- Over the past five years, BAH grew revenue faster — BAH at a 7.38% CAGR versus FLR at 1.92%.
- Does BAH or FLR pay a bigger dividend?
- BAH pays a dividend (3.64% yield) while FLR does not currently pay one.
- Is BAH or FLR more profitable?
- BAH runs the higher net margin — BAH at 7.57% versus FLR at 2.30%.
- Which has been the better investment, BAH or FLR?
- Over the past 10-year, BAH delivered the higher annualized total return — BAH at 9.77% versus FLR at 1.81%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Booz Allen Hamilton P/E ratioFluor P/E ratioBooz Allen Hamilton dividend yieldFluor dividend yieldBooz Allen Hamilton ROEFluor ROEBooz Allen Hamilton operating marginFluor operating marginBooz Allen Hamilton revenue growthFluor revenue growthBooz Allen Hamilton free cash flowFluor free cash flow
Booz Allen Hamilton & Fluor appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 25, 2026.