Is BAC or NVDA cheaper?

On trailing earnings, BAC is cheaper: BAC trades at a 13.90 P/E and NVDA at 31.42.

Which has grown faster, BAC or NVDA?

Over the past five years, NVDA grew revenue faster — BAC at a 13.95% CAGR versus NVDA at 68.23%.

Does BAC or NVDA pay a bigger dividend?

BAC yields 2.00% and NVDA yields 0.01% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is BAC or NVDA more profitable?

NVDA runs the higher net margin — BAC at 18.13% versus NVDA at 62.97%.

Which has been the better investment, BAC or NVDA?

Over the past 10-year, NVDA delivered the higher annualized total return — BAC at 17.60% versus NVDA at 68.06%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)

NVDA leads on 9 of 14 compared metrics, though BAC is the cheaper stock.

A side-by-side comparison of Bank of America Corporation and NVIDIA Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

BAC

Bank of America Corporation

$397.55B

$56.02Financial Services

Total return — BAC vs NVDA

growth of $100 · last 27y

BAC +72.2%NVDA +500157.2%NVDA compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

BAC NVDA

BAC vs NVDA: by the numbers

•NVDA is the larger company ($4.97T vs $397.55B market cap).
•BAC trades at the lower earnings multiple (13.90 vs 31.42 P/E).
•NVDA converts more revenue to profit (62.97% vs 18.13% net margin).
•NVDA grew revenue faster over the past five years (68.23% vs 13.95% CAGR).
•BAC pays the higher dividend yield (2.00% vs 0.01%).

Which is better, BAC or NVDA?

Metric tally: BAC 5 · NVDA 9

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueBAC(lower P/E)

GrowthNVDA(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeBAC(higher dividend yield)

QualityNVDA(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	BAC	NVDA
P/E ratio	13.90●	31.42
Forward P/E	12.56●	16.44
P/S ratio	2.38●	19.74
P/B ratio	1.38●	25.60
PEG ratio	0.68	0.57●
EV / EBITDA	—	25.96
FCF yield	—	2.38%

Profitability

Metric	BAC	NVDA
Gross margin	63.18%	74.15%●
Operating margin	22.87%	64.02%●
Net margin	18.13%	62.97%●
ROE	10.54%	81.65%●
ROIC	3.39%	62.88%●

Dividends

Metric	BAC	NVDA
Dividend yield	2.00%●	0.01%
Payout ratio	28.87%	0.61%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BAC	NVDA
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	13.95%	68.23%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	15.60%	85.78%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	—	85.52%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	8.63%	63.05%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, BAC or NVDA?: It depends on your goal. value: BAC (lower P/E); growth: NVDA (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: BAC (higher dividend yield); quality: NVDA (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, NVDA leads 9 to 5.
Is BAC or NVDA cheaper?: On trailing earnings, BAC is cheaper: BAC trades at a 13.90 P/E and NVDA at 31.42.
Which has grown faster, BAC or NVDA?: Over the past five years, NVDA grew revenue faster — BAC at a 13.95% CAGR versus NVDA at 68.23%.
Does BAC or NVDA pay a bigger dividend?: BAC yields 2.00% and NVDA yields 0.01% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is BAC or NVDA more profitable?: NVDA runs the higher net margin — BAC at 18.13% versus NVDA at 62.97%.
Which has been the better investment, BAC or NVDA?: Over the past 10-year, NVDA delivered the higher annualized total return — BAC at 17.60% versus NVDA at 68.06%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.