Bank of America Corporation (BAC) vs Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST)

A side-by-side comparison of Bank of America Corporation and Costco Wholesale Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare
Different business models: BAC is classified in Financial Services; COST is classified in Consumer Defensive. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

Total returnBAC vs COST

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 30y
BAC +539.7%COST +11175.1%COST compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
101001k10k100kStart $100200120062011201620212026$640$11,275
BAC COST

BAC vs COST: by the numbers

  • BAC is the larger company ($444.39B vs $428.66B market cap).
  • BAC trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (14.32 vs 47.87 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
  • BAC converts more revenue to profit (18.95% vs 3.01% net margin).
  • BAC grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.65% vs 9.48% CAGR).
  • BAC pays the higher dividend yield (1.80% vs 0.56%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricBACCOST
P/E ratio14.3247.87
Forward P/E13.4446.33
P/S ratio2.551.44
P/B ratio1.5112.62
PEG ratio0.735.23
EV / EBITDAN/A29.89
FCF yieldN/A2.08%

Profitability

MetricBACCOST
Gross margin56.08%12.88%
Operating margin24.70%3.82%
Net margin18.95%3.01%
ROE11.18%26.38%
ROIC3.39%19.44%

Dividends

MetricBACCOST
Dividend yield1.80%0.56%
Payout ratio28.87%29.44%

Growth (annualized)

MetricBACCOST
Revenue CAGR (5Y)14.65%9.48%
EPS CAGR (5Y)15.60%15.04%
FCF CAGR (5Y)N/A4.95%
Total return CAGR (5Y)13.03%18.31%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, BAC or COST?
BAC has the lower trailing P/E: BAC trades at 14.32 and COST at 47.87. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, BAC or COST?
Over the past five years, BAC grew revenue faster — BAC at a 14.65% CAGR versus COST at 9.48%.
Does BAC or COST pay a bigger dividend?
BAC yields 1.80% and COST yields 0.56% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is BAC or COST more profitable?
BAC runs the higher net margin — BAC at 18.95% versus COST at 3.01%.
How have BAC and COST total returns compared?
Over the past 10 years, BAC delivered 18.14% and COST delivered 20.06% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.