Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) vs Lowe's Companies, Inc. (LOW)
LOW leads on 7 of 13 compared metrics, though BABA is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Alibaba Group Holding Limited and Lowe's Companies, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 16, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
$112.55Consumer Cyclical
LOW
Lowe's Companies, Inc.
$220.19Consumer Cyclical
Total return — BABA vs LOW
growth of $100 · last 12yBABA +19.9%LOW +307.1%LOW compounded faster
BABA LOW
BABA vs LOW: by the numbers
- •BABA is the larger company ($263.42B vs $123.49B market cap).
- •BABA trades at the lower earnings multiple (18.17 vs 18.61 P/E).
- •BABA converts more revenue to profit (10.09% vs 7.51% net margin).
- •BABA grew revenue faster over the past five years (6.31% vs -1.28% CAGR).
- •LOW pays the higher dividend yield (2.18% vs 0.93%).
Which is better, BABA or LOW?
Metric tally: BABA 6 · LOW 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueBABA(lower P/E)
GrowthBABA(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeLOW(higher dividend yield)
QualityLOW(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BABA | LOW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 18.17● | 18.61 |
| Forward P/E | — | 16.39 |
| P/S ratio | 1.86 | 1.39● |
| P/B ratio | 1.77 | — |
| PEG ratio | 0.23● | 1.36 |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.85 | 13.58 |
| FCF yield | — | 6.18% |
Profitability
| Metric | BABA | LOW |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 39.77%● | 33.80% |
| Operating margin | 5.78% | 11.55%● |
| Net margin | 10.09%● | 7.51% |
| ROE | 9.58%● | -67.10% |
| ROIC | 3.17% | 20.42%● |
Dividends
| Metric | BABA | LOW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.93% | 2.18%● |
| Payout ratio | 15.89% | 40.44% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BABA | LOW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 6.31%● | -1.28% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -4.87% | 13.72%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -62.38% | -3.63%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -11.01% | 5.20%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, BABA or LOW?
- It depends on your goal. value: BABA (lower P/E); growth: BABA (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: LOW (higher dividend yield); quality: LOW (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, LOW leads 7 to 6.
- Is BABA or LOW cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, BABA is cheaper: BABA trades at a 18.17 P/E and LOW at 18.61.
- Which has grown faster, BABA or LOW?
- Over the past five years, BABA grew revenue faster — BABA at a 6.31% CAGR versus LOW at -1.28%.
- Does BABA or LOW pay a bigger dividend?
- BABA yields 0.93% and LOW yields 2.18% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is BABA or LOW more profitable?
- BABA runs the higher net margin — BABA at 10.09% versus LOW at 7.51%.
- Which has been the better investment, BABA or LOW?
- Over the past 10-year, LOW delivered the higher annualized total return — BABA at 4.09% versus LOW at 13.16%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Alibaba Group P/E ratioLowe's Companies P/E ratioAlibaba Group dividend yieldLowe's Companies dividend yieldAlibaba Group ROELowe's Companies ROEAlibaba Group operating marginLowe's Companies operating marginAlibaba Group revenue growthLowe's Companies revenue growthAlibaba Group free cash flowLowe's Companies free cash flow
Alibaba Group & Lowe's Companies appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 16, 2026.