The Boeing Company (BA) vs Siemens Energy AG (SMEGF)
SMEGF leads on 11 of 14 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of The Boeing Company and Siemens Energy AG across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 19, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — BA vs SMEGF
growth of $100 · last 6yBA +32.5%SMEGF +665.1%SMEGF compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
BA SMEGF
BA vs SMEGF: by the numbers
- •BA is the larger company ($175.57B vs $167.76B market cap).
- •SMEGF trades at the lower earnings multiple (65.80 vs 108.12 P/E).
- •SMEGF converts more revenue to profit (6.15% vs 2.46% net margin).
- •BA grew revenue faster over the past five years (10.30% vs 7.98% CAGR).
- •SMEGF pays a dividend (0.42% yield) while BA does not currently pay one.
Which is better, BA or SMEGF?
Metric tally: BA 3 · SMEGF 11It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueSMEGF(lower P/E)
GrowthBA(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualitySMEGF(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | BA | SMEGF |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 108.12 | 65.80● |
| Forward P/E | 54.13 | 32.61● |
| P/S ratio | 1.98● | 3.63 |
| P/B ratio | 30.44 | 13.69● |
| PEG ratio | — | 1.32 |
| EV / EBITDA | 30.04 | 29.43● |
| FCF yield | — | 4.18% |
Profitability
| Metric | BA | SMEGF |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 4.79% | 18.82%● |
| Operating margin | -5.89% | 7.96%● |
| Net margin | 2.46% | 6.15%● |
| ROE | 37.88%● | 23.20% |
| ROIC | -6.67% | 9.12%● |
Dividends
| Metric | BA | SMEGF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 0.42% |
| Payout ratio | — | 36.48% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | BA | SMEGF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 10.30%● | 7.98% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -24.64% | 45.13%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -37.08% | 47.34%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -1.26% | 45.66%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, BA or SMEGF?
- It depends on your goal. value: SMEGF (lower P/E); growth: BA (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: SMEGF (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, SMEGF leads 11 to 3.
- Is BA or SMEGF cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, SMEGF is cheaper: BA trades at a 108.12 P/E and SMEGF at 65.80.
- Which has grown faster, BA or SMEGF?
- Over the past five years, BA grew revenue faster — BA at a 10.30% CAGR versus SMEGF at 7.98%.
- Does BA or SMEGF pay a bigger dividend?
- SMEGF pays a dividend (0.42% yield) while BA does not currently pay one.
- Is BA or SMEGF more profitable?
- SMEGF runs the higher net margin — BA at 2.46% versus SMEGF at 6.15%.
- Which has been the better investment, BA or SMEGF?
- Over the past 5-year, SMEGF delivered the higher annualized total return — BA at 6.52% versus SMEGF at 45.66%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Boeing P/E ratioSiemens Energy AG P/E ratioBoeing dividend yieldSiemens Energy AG dividend yieldBoeing ROESiemens Energy AG ROEBoeing operating marginSiemens Energy AG operating marginBoeing revenue growthSiemens Energy AG revenue growthBoeing free cash flowSiemens Energy AG free cash flow
Boeing & Siemens Energy AG appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 19, 2026.