Which has the lower trailing P/E, BA or PH?

PH has the lower trailing P/E: BA trades at 79.82 and PH at 34.03. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, BA or PH?

Over the past five years, BA grew revenue faster — BA at a 8.80% CAGR versus PH at 8.43%.

Does BA or PH pay a bigger dividend?

PH pays a dividend (0.80% yield), while BA is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Is BA or PH more profitable?

PH runs the higher net margin — BA at 2.59% versus PH at 16.97%.

How have BA and PH total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, BA delivered 5.94% and PH delivered 24.74% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

The Boeing Company (BA) vs Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH)

A side-by-side comparison of The Boeing Company and Parker-Hannifin Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

The Boeing Company

$145.74B

$184.39IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Parker-Hannifin Corporation

$122.25B

$969.55IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — BA vs PH

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

BA +72.5% (+5.6%/yr)PH +807.2% (+24.7%/yr)PH compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

BA PH

BA vs PH: by the numbers

•BA is the larger company ($145.74B vs $122.25B market cap).
•PH trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (34.03 vs 79.82 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•PH converts more revenue to profit (16.97% vs 2.59% net margin).
•BA grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.80% vs 8.43% CAGR).
•PH pays a dividend (0.80% yield), while BA is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	BA	PH
P/E ratio	79.82	34.03
Forward P/E	N/A	27.60
P/S ratio	1.55	5.69
P/B ratio	23.89	7.94
EV / EBITDA	N/A	23.80
FCF yield	N/A	3.19%

Profitability

Metric	BA	PH
Gross margin	4.68%	37.69%
Operating margin	-5.41%	21.55%
Net margin	2.59%	16.97%
ROE	39.92%	23.68%
ROIC	-7.72%	13.94%

Dividends

Metric	BA	PH
Dividend yield	N/A	0.80%
Payout ratio	N/A	26.68%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BA	PH
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	8.80%	8.43%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	16.37%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	N/A	10.55%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-0.38%	28.92%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, BA or PH?: PH has the lower trailing P/E: BA trades at 79.82 and PH at 34.03. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, BA or PH?: Over the past five years, BA grew revenue faster — BA at a 8.80% CAGR versus PH at 8.43%.
Does BA or PH pay a bigger dividend?: PH pays a dividend (0.80% yield), while BA is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is BA or PH more profitable?: PH runs the higher net margin — BA at 2.59% versus PH at 16.97%.
How have BA and PH total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, BA delivered 5.94% and PH delivered 24.74% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full BA analysis Full PH analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Boeing P/E ratio Parker-Hannifin P/E ratio Parker-Hannifin dividend yield Boeing ROE Parker-Hannifin ROE Boeing operating margin Parker-Hannifin operating margin Boeing revenue growth Parker-Hannifin revenue growth Boeing free cash flow Parker-Hannifin free cash flow

Boeing & Parker-Hannifin appear in these rankings

25+ Year Dividend Growers Highest ROE Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.