On trailing earnings, PH is cheaper: BA trades at a 106.33 P/E and PH at 33.34.

Which has grown faster, BA or PH?

Over the past five years, BA grew revenue faster — BA at a 10.30% CAGR versus PH at 9.15%.

Does BA or PH pay a bigger dividend?

PH pays a dividend (0.82% yield) while BA does not currently pay one.

Is BA or PH more profitable?

PH runs the higher net margin — BA at 2.46% versus PH at 16.58%.

Which has been the better investment, BA or PH?

Over the past 10-year, PH delivered the higher annualized total return — BA at 6.23% versus PH at 25.01%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

The Boeing Company (BA) vs Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH)

PH leads on 11 of 14 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of The Boeing Company and Parker-Hannifin Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

The Boeing Company

$172.68B

$219.05Industrials

Parker-Hannifin Corporation

$113.92B

$903.48Industrials

Total return — BA vs PH

growth of $100 · last 30y

BA +425.5%PH +4872.4%PH compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

BA PH

BA vs PH: by the numbers

•BA is the larger company ($172.68B vs $113.92B market cap).
•PH trades at the lower earnings multiple (33.34 vs 106.33 P/E).
•PH converts more revenue to profit (16.58% vs 2.46% net margin).
•BA grew revenue faster over the past five years (10.30% vs 9.15% CAGR).
•PH pays a dividend (0.82% yield) while BA does not currently pay one.

Which is better, BA or PH?

Metric tally: BA 3 · PH 11

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValuePH(lower P/E)

GrowthBA(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityPH(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	BA	PH
P/E ratio	106.33	33.34●
Forward P/E	53.24	26.53●
P/S ratio	1.94●	5.51
P/B ratio	29.94	7.92●
PEG ratio	—	1.04
EV / EBITDA	29.63	22.16●
FCF yield	—	3.18%

Profitability

Metric	BA	PH
Gross margin	4.79%	37.23%●
Operating margin	-5.89%	20.87%●
Net margin	2.46%	16.58%●
ROE	37.88%●	23.82%
ROIC	-6.67%	13.69%●

Dividends

Metric	BA	PH
Dividend yield	—	0.82%
Payout ratio	—	26.89%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	BA	PH
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	10.30%●	9.15%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-24.64%	24.00%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-37.08%	8.25%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-2.39%	26.11%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, BA or PH?: It depends on your goal. value: PH (lower P/E); growth: BA (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: PH (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, PH leads 11 to 3.
Is BA or PH cheaper?: On trailing earnings, PH is cheaper: BA trades at a 106.33 P/E and PH at 33.34.
Which has grown faster, BA or PH?: Over the past five years, BA grew revenue faster — BA at a 10.30% CAGR versus PH at 9.15%.
Does BA or PH pay a bigger dividend?: PH pays a dividend (0.82% yield) while BA does not currently pay one.
Is BA or PH more profitable?: PH runs the higher net margin — BA at 2.46% versus PH at 16.58%.
Which has been the better investment, BA or PH?: Over the past 10-year, PH delivered the higher annualized total return — BA at 6.23% versus PH at 25.01%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full BA analysis Full PH analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Boeing P/E ratio Parker-Hannifin P/E ratio Boeing dividend yield Parker-Hannifin dividend yield Boeing ROE Parker-Hannifin ROE Boeing operating margin Parker-Hannifin operating margin Boeing revenue growth Parker-Hannifin revenue growth Boeing free cash flow Parker-Hannifin free cash flow

Boeing & Parker-Hannifin appear in these rankings

Dividend Aristocrats Highest ROE Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.