Barrick Mining Corporation (B) vs The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW)
B leads on 14 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Barrick Mining Corporation and The Sherwin-Williams Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 20, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
B
Barrick Mining Corporation
$40.34Basic Materials
SHW
The Sherwin-Williams Company
$320.79Basic Materials
Total return — B vs SHW
growth of $100 · last 30yB +43.4%SHW +4235.0%SHW compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
B SHW
B vs SHW: by the numbers
- •SHW is the larger company ($79.12B vs $67.59B market cap).
- •B trades at the lower earnings multiple (11.21 vs 30.79 P/E).
- •B converts more revenue to profit (32.10% vs 10.86% net margin).
- •B grew revenue faster over the past five years (76.96% vs 4.87% CAGR).
- •B pays the higher dividend yield (2.28% vs 0.99%).
Which is better, B or SHW?
Metric tally: B 14 · SHW 3It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueB(lower P/E)
GrowthB(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeB(higher dividend yield)
QualitySHW(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | B | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 11.21● | 30.79 |
| Forward P/E | 9.38● | 27.37 |
| P/S ratio | 3.56 | 3.33● |
| P/B ratio | 2.46● | 17.96 |
| PEG ratio | 0.11● | 4.57 |
| EV / EBITDA | 5.03● | 20.83 |
| FCF yield | 7.46%● | 3.65% |
Profitability
| Metric | B | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 54.31%● | 49.12% |
| Operating margin | 51.62%● | 16.13% |
| Net margin | 32.10%● | 10.86% |
| ROE | 22.23% | 58.66%● |
| ROIC | 13.68% | 15.21%● |
Dividends
| Metric | B | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.28%● | 0.99% |
| Payout ratio | 31.40% | 30.64% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | B | SHW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 76.96%● | 4.87% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 18.58%● | 6.74% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 6.45%● | -2.44% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 17.48%● | 4.59% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, B or SHW?
- It depends on your goal. value: B (lower P/E); growth: B (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: B (higher dividend yield); quality: SHW (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, B leads 14 to 3.
- Is B or SHW cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, B is cheaper: B trades at a 11.21 P/E and SHW at 30.79.
- Which has grown faster, B or SHW?
- Over the past five years, B grew revenue faster — B at a 76.96% CAGR versus SHW at 4.87%.
- Does B or SHW pay a bigger dividend?
- B yields 2.28% and SHW yields 0.99% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is B or SHW more profitable?
- B runs the higher net margin — B at 32.10% versus SHW at 10.86%.
- Which has been the better investment, B or SHW?
- Over the past 10-year, SHW delivered the higher annualized total return — B at 9.52% versus SHW at 13.85%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Barrick Mining P/E ratioSherwin-Williams P/E ratioBarrick Mining dividend yieldSherwin-Williams dividend yieldBarrick Mining ROESherwin-Williams ROEBarrick Mining operating marginSherwin-Williams operating marginBarrick Mining revenue growthSherwin-Williams revenue growthBarrick Mining free cash flowSherwin-Williams free cash flow
Barrick Mining & Sherwin-Williams appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 20, 2026.