Is AZO or SE cheaper?

On trailing earnings, AZO is cheaper: AZO trades at a 21.07 P/E and SE at 35.38.

Which has grown faster, AZO or SE?

Over the past five years, SE grew revenue faster — AZO at a 6.98% CAGR versus SE at 35.96%.

Is AZO or SE more profitable?

AZO runs the higher net margin — AZO at 12.40% versus SE at 6.40%.

Which has been the better investment, AZO or SE?

Over the past 5-year, AZO delivered the higher annualized total return — AZO at 15.18% versus SE at -20.23%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

AutoZone, Inc. (AZO) vs Sea Limited (SE)

AZO leads on 8 of 14 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of AutoZone, Inc. and Sea Limited across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 19, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

AZO

AutoZone, Inc.

$50.16B

$3064.48Consumer Cyclical

Sea Limited

$55.91B

$91.28Consumer Cyclical

Total return — AZO vs SE

growth of $100 · last 9y

AZO +419.4%SE +461.4%SE compounded faster

AZO SE

AZO vs SE: by the numbers

•SE is the larger company ($55.91B vs $50.16B market cap).
•AZO trades at the lower earnings multiple (21.07 vs 35.38 P/E).
•AZO converts more revenue to profit (12.40% vs 6.40% net margin).
•SE grew revenue faster over the past five years (35.96% vs 6.98% CAGR).

Which is better, AZO or SE?

Metric tally: AZO 8 · SE 6

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueAZO(lower P/E)

GrowthSE(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityAZO(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	AZO	SE
P/E ratio	21.07●	35.38
Forward P/E	17.45●	18.63
P/S ratio	2.58	2.30●
P/B ratio	—	4.52
PEG ratio	1.39	0.20●
EV / EBITDA	15.01●	20.60
FCF yield	3.16%	5.48%●

Profitability

Metric	AZO	SE
Gross margin	51.75%●	44.27%
Operating margin	18.02%●	8.20%
Net margin	12.40%●	6.40%
ROE	-73.17%	12.54%●
ROIC	28.13%●	8.10%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	AZO	SE
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	6.98%	35.96%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	15.11%	—
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-11.96%	97.91%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	17.20%●	-20.23%

Frequently asked

Which is better, AZO or SE?: It depends on your goal. value: AZO (lower P/E); growth: SE (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: AZO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, AZO leads 8 to 6.
Is AZO or SE cheaper?: On trailing earnings, AZO is cheaper: AZO trades at a 21.07 P/E and SE at 35.38.
Which has grown faster, AZO or SE?: Over the past five years, SE grew revenue faster — AZO at a 6.98% CAGR versus SE at 35.96%.
Is AZO or SE more profitable?: AZO runs the higher net margin — AZO at 12.40% versus SE at 6.40%.
Which has been the better investment, AZO or SE?: Over the past 5-year, AZO delivered the higher annualized total return — AZO at 15.18% versus SE at -20.23%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full AZO analysis Full SE analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

AutoZone P/E ratio Sea P/E ratio AutoZone dividend yield Sea dividend yield AutoZone ROE Sea ROE AutoZone operating margin Sea operating margin AutoZone revenue growth Sea revenue growth AutoZone free cash flow Sea free cash flow

AutoZone & Sea appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 19, 2026.