Is AZN or WFC cheaper?

On trailing earnings, WFC is cheaper: AZN trades at a 26.91 P/E and WFC at 12.73.

Which has grown faster, AZN or WFC?

Over the past five years, AZN grew revenue faster — AZN at a 16.99% CAGR versus WFC at 9.46%.

Does AZN or WFC pay a bigger dividend?

AZN yields 1.79% and WFC yields 2.17% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Which has been the better investment, AZN or WFC?

Over the past 10-year, AZN delivered the higher annualized total return — AZN at 15.77% versus WFC at 9.11%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

AstraZeneca PLC (AZN) vs Wells Fargo & Company (WFC)

WFC leads on 7 of 13 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of AstraZeneca PLC and Wells Fargo & Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 17, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Wells Fargo & Company

$259.78B

$83.14Financial Services

Total return — AZN vs WFC

growth of $100 · last 30y

AZN +732.8%WFC +891.8%WFC compounded faster

AZN WFC

AZN vs WFC: by the numbers

•AZN is the larger company ($277.15B vs $259.78B market cap).
•WFC trades at the lower earnings multiple (12.73 vs 26.91 P/E).
•AZN grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.99% vs 9.46% CAGR).
•WFC pays the higher dividend yield (2.17% vs 1.79%).

Which is better, AZN or WFC?

Metric tally: AZN 6 · WFC 7

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueWFC(lower P/E)

GrowthAZN(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeWFC(higher dividend yield)

QualityAZN(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	AZN	WFC
P/E ratio	26.91	12.73●
Forward P/E	15.33	11.88●
P/S ratio	4.62	2.13●
P/B ratio	5.89	1.50●
PEG ratio	0.14●	0.79
EV / EBITDA	14.92	—
FCF yield	2.89%	—

Profitability

Metric	AZN	WFC
Gross margin	81.68%●	64.55%
Operating margin	23.69%●	20.47%
Net margin	17.19%	17.29%
ROE	21.95%●	12.18%
ROIC	13.03%●	3.16%

Dividends

Metric	AZN	WFC
Dividend yield	1.79%	2.17%●
Payout ratio	48.48%	28.17%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	AZN	WFC
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	16.99%●	9.46%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	22.02%	72.38%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	15.68%	—
Total return CAGR (5Y)	10.82%	16.03%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, AZN or WFC?: It depends on your goal. value: WFC (lower P/E); growth: AZN (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: WFC (higher dividend yield); quality: AZN (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, WFC leads 7 to 6.
Is AZN or WFC cheaper?: On trailing earnings, WFC is cheaper: AZN trades at a 26.91 P/E and WFC at 12.73.
Which has grown faster, AZN or WFC?: Over the past five years, AZN grew revenue faster — AZN at a 16.99% CAGR versus WFC at 9.46%.
Does AZN or WFC pay a bigger dividend?: AZN yields 1.79% and WFC yields 2.17% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Which has been the better investment, AZN or WFC?: Over the past 10-year, AZN delivered the higher annualized total return — AZN at 15.77% versus WFC at 9.11%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full AZN analysis Full WFC analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

AstraZeneca P/E ratio Wells Fargo & P/E ratio AstraZeneca dividend yield Wells Fargo & dividend yield AstraZeneca ROE Wells Fargo & ROE AstraZeneca operating margin Wells Fargo & operating margin AstraZeneca revenue growth Wells Fargo & revenue growth AstraZeneca free cash flow Wells Fargo & free cash flow

AstraZeneca & Wells Fargo & appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 17, 2026.