AstraZeneca PLC (AZN) vs Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG)
BKNG leads on 12 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of AstraZeneca PLC and Booking Holdings Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
AZN
AstraZeneca PLC
$178.75Healthcare
BKNG
Booking Holdings Inc.
$164.94Consumer Cyclical
Total return — AZN vs BKNG
growth of $100 · last 27yAZN +269.0%BKNG +896.0%BKNG compounded faster
AZN BKNG
AZN vs BKNG: by the numbers
- •AZN is the larger company ($277.22B vs $127.81B market cap).
- •BKNG trades at the lower earnings multiple (21.75 vs 26.92 P/E).
- •BKNG converts more revenue to profit (22.23% vs 17.19% net margin).
- •BKNG grew revenue faster over the past five years (37.43% vs 16.99% CAGR).
- •AZN pays the higher dividend yield (1.79% vs 0.97%).
Which is better, AZN or BKNG?
Metric tally: AZN 3 · BKNG 12It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueBKNG(lower P/E)
GrowthBKNG(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeAZN(higher dividend yield)
QualityBKNG(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | AZN | BKNG |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 26.92 | 21.75● |
| Forward P/E | 15.33 | 13.38● |
| P/S ratio | 4.62● | 4.73 |
| P/B ratio | 5.90 | — |
| PEG ratio | 0.14 | 0.14 |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.92 | 14.07● |
| FCF yield | 3.26% | 6.90%● |
Profitability
| Metric | AZN | BKNG |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 81.68% | 100.00%● |
| Operating margin | 23.69% | 34.28%● |
| Net margin | 17.19% | 22.23%● |
| ROE | 21.95%● | -96.88% |
| ROIC | 13.03% | 50.82%● |
Dividends
| Metric | AZN | BKNG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.79%● | 0.97% |
| Payout ratio | 48.48% | 24.14% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AZN | BKNG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 16.99% | 37.43%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 22.02% | 158.62%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 18.52% | 39.83%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 11.03% | 12.81%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, AZN or BKNG?
- It depends on your goal. value: BKNG (lower P/E); growth: BKNG (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: AZN (higher dividend yield); quality: BKNG (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, BKNG leads 12 to 3.
- Is AZN or BKNG cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, BKNG is cheaper: AZN trades at a 26.92 P/E and BKNG at 21.75.
- Which has grown faster, AZN or BKNG?
- Over the past five years, BKNG grew revenue faster — AZN at a 16.99% CAGR versus BKNG at 37.43%.
- Does AZN or BKNG pay a bigger dividend?
- AZN yields 1.79% and BKNG yields 0.97% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is AZN or BKNG more profitable?
- BKNG runs the higher net margin — AZN at 17.19% versus BKNG at 22.23%.
- Which has been the better investment, AZN or BKNG?
- Over the past 10-year, AZN delivered the higher annualized total return — AZN at 15.77% versus BKNG at 12.30%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
AstraZeneca P/E ratioBooking P/E ratioAstraZeneca dividend yieldBooking dividend yieldAstraZeneca ROEBooking ROEAstraZeneca operating marginBooking operating marginAstraZeneca revenue growthBooking revenue growthAstraZeneca free cash flowBooking free cash flow
AstraZeneca & Booking appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.