Axon Enterprise, Inc. (AXON) vs Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI)
TRI leads on 11 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Axon Enterprise, Inc. and Thomson Reuters Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
AXON
Axon Enterprise, Inc.
$542.47IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 15, 2026, 10:45 AM EDT
TRI
Thomson Reuters Corporation
$98.30IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 15, 2026, 10:45 AM EDT
Total return — AXON vs TRI
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 24yAXON +38439.4%TRI +370.1%AXON compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
AXON TRI
AXON vs TRI: by the numbers
- •AXON is the larger company ($43.72B vs $42.91B market cap).
- •TRI trades at the lower earnings multiple (26.82 vs 219.60 P/E).
- •TRI converts more revenue to profit (19.93% vs 6.91% net margin).
- •AXON grew revenue faster over the past five years (32.56% vs 4.86% CAGR).
- •TRI pays a dividend (4.30% yield) while AXON does not currently pay one.
Which is better, AXON or TRI?
Metric tally: AXON 5 · TRI 11It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueTRI(lower P/E)
GrowthAXON(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityTRI(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | AXON | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 219.60 | 26.82● |
| Forward P/E | 71.18 | 21.18● |
| P/S ratio | 15.13 | 5.24● |
| P/B ratio | 12.77 | 3.39● |
| PEG ratio | 1.86● | 3.72 |
| EV / EBITDA | 365.32 | 14.11● |
| FCF yield | 0.04% | 5.21%● |
Profitability
| Metric | AXON | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 59.32% | 75.81%● |
| Operating margin | 1.28% | 26.66%● |
| Net margin | 6.91% | 19.93%● |
| ROE | 5.84% | 12.89%● |
| ROIC | -1.11% | 10.13%● |
Dividends
| Metric | AXON | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 4.30% |
| Payout ratio | — | 116.05% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AXON | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 32.56%● | 4.86% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 117.98%● | 7.22% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 32.23%● | 9.45% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 25.29%● | -1.13% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, AXON or TRI?
- It depends on your goal. value: TRI (lower P/E); growth: AXON (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: TRI (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, TRI leads 11 to 5.
- Is AXON or TRI cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, TRI is cheaper: AXON trades at a 219.60 P/E and TRI at 26.82.
- Which has grown faster, AXON or TRI?
- Over the past five years, AXON grew revenue faster — AXON at a 32.56% CAGR versus TRI at 4.86%.
- Does AXON or TRI pay a bigger dividend?
- TRI pays a dividend (4.30% yield) while AXON does not currently pay one.
- Is AXON or TRI more profitable?
- TRI runs the higher net margin — AXON at 6.91% versus TRI at 19.93%.
- Which has been the better investment, AXON or TRI?
- Over the past 10-year, AXON delivered the higher annualized total return — AXON at 34.79% versus TRI at 8.55%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Axon Enterprise P/E ratioThomson Reuters P/E ratioAxon Enterprise dividend yieldThomson Reuters dividend yieldAxon Enterprise ROEThomson Reuters ROEAxon Enterprise operating marginThomson Reuters operating marginAxon Enterprise revenue growthThomson Reuters revenue growthAxon Enterprise free cash flowThomson Reuters free cash flow
Axon Enterprise & Thomson Reuters appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 14, 2026.