Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share (AXG) vs Zhibao Technology Inc. Class A Ordinary Shares (ZBAO)

Over the past year, AXG lagged ZBAO — -96.16% vs -91.83% annualized total return (price plus dividends).

A side-by-side comparison of Solowin Holdings Ordinary Share and Zhibao Technology Inc. Class A Ordinary Shares across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total return — AXG vs ZBAO

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 3y
AXG -98.3% (-74.2%/yr)ZBAO -97.6% (-71.2%/yr)ZBAO compounded faster over this window
0200400600Start $10020252026$2$2
AXG ZBAO

Metrics side by side

Did AXG beat ZBAO?

Over the past year, AXG lagged ZBAO — -96.16% vs -91.83% annualized total return (price plus dividends).

Total return (annualized)

MetricAXGZBAO
Total return (1Y)-96.16%-91.83%
Total return CAGR (3Y)-65.23%N/A

ZBAO is an index fund, so valuation, profitability, and per-company growth metrics don't apply — the head-to-head here is total return (price plus reinvested dividends).

Frequently asked

Has AXG beaten ZBAO?
Over the past year, AXG lagged ZBAO — -96.16% vs -91.83% annualized total return (price plus dividends).

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.