On trailing earnings, FT is cheaper: AX trades at a 11.58 P/E and FT at 3.00.

Which has grown faster, AX or FT?

Over the past five years, AX grew revenue faster — AX at a 24.16% CAGR versus FT at 3.92%.

Does AX or FT pay a bigger dividend?

FT pays a dividend (6.34% yield) while AX does not currently pay one.

Is AX or FT more profitable?

FT runs the higher net margin — AX at 22.67% versus FT at 179.50%.

Which has been the better investment, AX or FT?

Over the past 10-year, AX delivered the higher annualized total return — AX at 19.23% versus FT at 8.42%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Axos Financial, Inc. (AX) vs Franklin Universal Trust (FT)

FT leads on 6 of 11 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Axos Financial, Inc. and Franklin Universal Trust across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 26, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Axos Financial, Inc.

$5.42B

$95.34Financial Services

Franklin Universal Trust

$202M

$8.04Financial Services

Total return — AX vs FT

growth of $100 · last 21y

AX +1878.0%FT +31.4%AX compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

AX FT

AX vs FT: by the numbers

•AX is the larger company ($5.42B vs $202M market cap).
•FT trades at the lower earnings multiple (3.00 vs 11.58 P/E).
•FT converts more revenue to profit (179.50% vs 22.67% net margin).
•AX grew revenue faster over the past five years (24.16% vs 3.92% CAGR).
•FT pays a dividend (6.34% yield) while AX does not currently pay one.

Which is better, AX or FT?

Metric tally: AX 5 · FT 6

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueFT(lower P/E)

GrowthAX(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityAX(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	AX	FT
P/E ratio	11.58	3.00●
Forward P/E	11.23	—
P/S ratio	2.62●	5.41
P/B ratio	1.80	0.89●
PEG ratio	0.57	—

Profitability

Metric	AX	FT
Gross margin	62.42%	86.88%●
Operating margin	30.78%	198.87%●
Net margin	22.67%	179.50%●
ROE	15.53%	29.45%●
ROIC	12.02%●	8.38%

Dividends

Metric	AX	FT
Dividend yield	—	6.34%
Payout ratio	—	67.11%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	AX	FT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	24.16%●	3.92%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	20.39%●	-3.82%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	15.04%●	6.94%

Frequently asked

Which is better, AX or FT?: It depends on your goal. value: FT (lower P/E); growth: AX (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: AX (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, FT leads 6 to 5.
Is AX or FT cheaper?: On trailing earnings, FT is cheaper: AX trades at a 11.58 P/E and FT at 3.00.
Which has grown faster, AX or FT?: Over the past five years, AX grew revenue faster — AX at a 24.16% CAGR versus FT at 3.92%.
Does AX or FT pay a bigger dividend?: FT pays a dividend (6.34% yield) while AX does not currently pay one.
Is AX or FT more profitable?: FT runs the higher net margin — AX at 22.67% versus FT at 179.50%.
Which has been the better investment, AX or FT?: Over the past 10-year, AX delivered the higher annualized total return — AX at 19.23% versus FT at 8.42%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full AX analysis Full FT analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Axos Financial P/E ratio Franklin Universal P/E ratio Axos Financial dividend yield Franklin Universal dividend yield Axos Financial ROE Franklin Universal ROE Axos Financial operating margin Franklin Universal operating margin Axos Financial revenue growth Franklin Universal revenue growth Axos Financial free cash flow Franklin Universal free cash flow

Axos Financial & Franklin Universal appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 26, 2026.