Avery Dennison Corporation (AVY) vs Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU)
LULU leads on 13 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Avery Dennison Corporation and Lululemon Athletica Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 23, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
AVY
Avery Dennison Corporation
$157.48Consumer Cyclical
LULU
Lululemon Athletica Inc.
$105.43Consumer Cyclical
Total return — AVY vs LULU
growth of $100 · last 19yAVY +149.7%LULU +653.1%LULU compounded faster
AVY LULU
AVY vs LULU: by the numbers
- •AVY is the larger company ($12.05B vs $11.97B market cap).
- •LULU trades at the lower earnings multiple (8.54 vs 17.75 P/E).
- •LULU converts more revenue to profit (13.03% vs 7.66% net margin).
- •LULU grew revenue faster over the past five years (17.61% vs 5.01% CAGR).
- •AVY pays a dividend (2.43% yield) while LULU does not currently pay one.
Which is better, AVY or LULU?
Metric tally: AVY 2 · LULU 13It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueLULU(lower P/E)
GrowthLULU(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityLULU(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | AVY | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 17.75 | 8.54● |
| Forward P/E | 15.70 | 9.59● |
| P/S ratio | 1.35 | 1.09● |
| P/B ratio | 5.27 | 2.52● |
| PEG ratio | 25.78 | 0.36● |
| EV / EBITDA | 11.06 | 4.92● |
| FCF yield | 7.20% | 10.52%● |
Profitability
| Metric | AVY | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 28.76% | 55.70%● |
| Operating margin | 12.45% | 18.21%● |
| Net margin | 7.66% | 13.03%● |
| ROE | 29.98% | 30.25% |
| ROIC | 12.31% | 22.70%● |
Dividends
| Metric | AVY | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.43% | — |
| Payout ratio | 43.41% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AVY | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 5.01% | 17.61%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 15.98% | 24.02%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 9.88%● | 7.36% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -3.91%● | -21.74% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, AVY or LULU?
- It depends on your goal. value: LULU (lower P/E); growth: LULU (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: LULU (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, LULU leads 13 to 2.
- Is AVY or LULU cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, LULU is cheaper: AVY trades at a 17.75 P/E and LULU at 8.54.
- Which has grown faster, AVY or LULU?
- Over the past five years, LULU grew revenue faster — AVY at a 5.01% CAGR versus LULU at 17.61%.
- Does AVY or LULU pay a bigger dividend?
- AVY pays a dividend (2.43% yield) while LULU does not currently pay one.
- Is AVY or LULU more profitable?
- LULU runs the higher net margin — AVY at 7.66% versus LULU at 13.03%.
- Which has been the better investment, AVY or LULU?
- Over the past 10-year, AVY delivered the higher annualized total return — AVY at 9.49% versus LULU at 3.98%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Avery Dennison P/E ratioLululemon Athletica P/E ratioAvery Dennison dividend yieldLululemon Athletica dividend yieldAvery Dennison ROELululemon Athletica ROEAvery Dennison operating marginLululemon Athletica operating marginAvery Dennison revenue growthLululemon Athletica revenue growthAvery Dennison free cash flowLululemon Athletica free cash flow
Avery Dennison & Lululemon Athletica appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 23, 2026.