Which has the lower trailing P/E, AVO or JBSS?

JBSS has the lower trailing P/E: AVO trades at 406.95 and JBSS at 12.90. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, AVO or JBSS?

Over the past five years, AVO grew revenue faster — AVO at a 9.21% CAGR versus JBSS at 6.49%.

Does AVO or JBSS pay a bigger dividend?

JBSS pays a dividend (6.61% yield), while AVO has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is AVO or JBSS more profitable?

JBSS runs the higher net margin — AVO at 0.12% versus JBSS at 5.27%.

How have AVO and JBSS total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, AVO delivered -7.52% and JBSS delivered -0.32% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Mission Produce, Inc. (AVO) vs John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. (JBSS)

A side-by-side comparison of Mission Produce, Inc. and John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

AVO

Mission Produce, Inc.

$1.14B

$12.86Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 1:30 PM EDT

JBSS

John B. Sanfilippo & Son, Inc.

$793M

$67.87Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 1:25 PM EDT

Total return — AVO vs JBSS

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6y

AVO -8.0% (-1.4%/yr)JBSS +18.1% (+2.8%/yr)JBSS compounded faster over this window

AVO JBSS

AVO vs JBSS: by the numbers

•AVO is the larger company ($1.14B vs $793M market cap).
•JBSS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (12.90 vs 406.95 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•JBSS converts more revenue to profit (5.27% vs 0.12% net margin).
•AVO grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.21% vs 6.49% CAGR).
•JBSS pays a dividend (6.61% yield), while AVO has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	AVO	JBSS
P/E ratio	406.95	12.90
Forward P/E	N/A	12.66
PEG ratio	77.22	N/A
P/S ratio	0.85	0.67
P/B ratio	1.49	2.09
EV / EBITDA	19.07	7.50
FCF yield	N/A	4.51%

Profitability

Metric	AVO	JBSS
Gross margin	11.39%	17.96%
Operating margin	3.21%	7.40%
Net margin	0.12%	5.27%
ROE	0.21%	16.30%
ROIC	1.67%	12.11%

Dividends

Metric	AVO	JBSS
Dividend yield	N/A	6.61%
Payout ratio	N/A	85.55%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	AVO	JBSS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	9.21%	6.49%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	5.27%	-0.33%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	N/A	110.20%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-7.52%	-0.32%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, AVO or JBSS?: JBSS has the lower trailing P/E: AVO trades at 406.95 and JBSS at 12.90. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, AVO or JBSS?: Over the past five years, AVO grew revenue faster — AVO at a 9.21% CAGR versus JBSS at 6.49%.
Does AVO or JBSS pay a bigger dividend?: JBSS pays a dividend (6.61% yield), while AVO has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is AVO or JBSS more profitable?: JBSS runs the higher net margin — AVO at 0.12% versus JBSS at 5.27%.
How have AVO and JBSS total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, AVO delivered -7.52% and JBSS delivered -0.32% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full AVO analysis Full JBSS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Mission Produce P/E ratio John B. Sanfilippo & Son P/E ratio John B. Sanfilippo & Son dividend yield Mission Produce ROE John B. Sanfilippo & Son ROE Mission Produce operating margin John B. Sanfilippo & Son operating margin Mission Produce revenue growth John B. Sanfilippo & Son revenue growth Mission Produce free cash flow John B. Sanfilippo & Son free cash flow

Mission Produce & John B. Sanfilippo & Son appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.