Which has the lower trailing P/E, AVGO or MTZ?

MTZ has the lower trailing P/E: AVGO trades at 63.87 and MTZ at 58.98. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, AVGO or MTZ?

Over the past five years, AVGO grew revenue faster — AVGO at a 24.17% CAGR versus MTZ at 18.00%.

Does AVGO or MTZ pay a bigger dividend?

AVGO pays a dividend (0.66% yield), while MTZ is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Is AVGO or MTZ more profitable?

AVGO runs the higher net margin — AVGO at 38.85% versus MTZ at 3.00%.

How have AVGO and MTZ total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, AVGO delivered 40.40% and MTZ delivered 29.91% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) vs MasTec, Inc. (MTZ)

A side-by-side comparison of Broadcom Inc. and MasTec, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Different business models: AVGO is classified in Technology; MTZ is classified in Industrials. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

AVGO

Broadcom Inc.

$1.81T

$380.91TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

MTZ

MasTec, Inc.

$24.69B

$312.44IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — AVGO vs MTZ

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 17y

AVGO +33132.1%MTZ +3525.3%AVGO compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

AVGO MTZ

AVGO vs MTZ: by the numbers

•AVGO is the larger company ($1.81T vs $24.69B market cap).
•MTZ trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (58.98 vs 63.87 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•AVGO converts more revenue to profit (38.85% vs 3.00% net margin).
•AVGO grew revenue faster over the past five years (24.17% vs 18.00% CAGR).
•AVGO pays a dividend (0.66% yield), while MTZ is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	AVGO	MTZ
P/E ratio	63.87	58.98
Forward P/E	33.06	36.85
P/S ratio	24.76	1.74
P/B ratio	21.31	8.02
PEG ratio	0.26	0.29
EV / EBITDA	45.90	23.91
FCF yield	1.75%	0.97%

Profitability

Metric	AVGO	MTZ
Gross margin	66.96%	11.30%
Operating margin	43.66%	5.65%
Net margin	38.85%	3.00%
ROE	33.43%	13.86%
ROIC	16.36%	7.44%

Dividends

Metric	AVGO	MTZ
Dividend yield	0.66%	N/A
Payout ratio	51.73%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	AVGO	MTZ
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	24.17%	18.00%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	49.36%	2.94%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	20.74%	-19.53%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	54.69%	27.71%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, AVGO or MTZ?: MTZ has the lower trailing P/E: AVGO trades at 63.87 and MTZ at 58.98. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, AVGO or MTZ?: Over the past five years, AVGO grew revenue faster — AVGO at a 24.17% CAGR versus MTZ at 18.00%.
Does AVGO or MTZ pay a bigger dividend?: AVGO pays a dividend (0.66% yield), while MTZ is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is AVGO or MTZ more profitable?: AVGO runs the higher net margin — AVGO at 38.85% versus MTZ at 3.00%.
How have AVGO and MTZ total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, AVGO delivered 40.40% and MTZ delivered 29.91% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full AVGO analysis Full MTZ analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Broadcom P/E ratio MasTec P/E ratio Broadcom dividend yield MasTec dividend yield Broadcom ROE MasTec ROE Broadcom operating margin MasTec operating margin Broadcom revenue growth MasTec revenue growth Broadcom free cash flow MasTec free cash flow

Broadcom & MasTec appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.