Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) vs Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB)
KMB leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Broadcom Inc. and Kimberly-Clark Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
$382.07Technology
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
$102.29Consumer Defensive
Total return — AVGO vs KMB
growth of $100 · last 17yAVGO +23484.6%KMB +84.6%AVGO compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
AVGO KMB
AVGO vs KMB: by the numbers
- •AVGO is the larger company ($1.82T vs $33.95B market cap).
- •KMB trades at the lower earnings multiple (16.06 vs 63.68 P/E).
- •AVGO converts more revenue to profit (38.85% vs 12.81% net margin).
- •AVGO grew revenue faster over the past five years (24.17% vs -2.61% CAGR).
- •KMB pays the higher dividend yield (4.97% vs 0.65%).
Which is better, AVGO or KMB?
Metric tally: AVGO 7 · KMB 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueKMB(lower P/E)
GrowthAVGO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeKMB(higher dividend yield)
QualityKMB(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | AVGO | KMB |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 63.68 | 16.06● |
| Forward P/E | 19.68 | 13.49● |
| P/S ratio | 24.69 | 2.06● |
| P/B ratio | 21.24 | 18.98● |
| PEG ratio | 0.26 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 45.41 | 13.26● |
| FCF yield | 1.76% | 7.56%● |
Profitability
| Metric | AVGO | KMB |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 66.96%● | 35.86% |
| Operating margin | 43.66%● | 13.27% |
| Net margin | 38.85%● | 12.81% |
| ROE | 33.43% | 117.98%● |
| ROIC | 16.36% | 17.62%● |
Dividends
| Metric | AVGO | KMB |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.65% | 4.97%● |
| Payout ratio | 50.51% | 83.55% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AVGO | KMB |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 24.17%● | -2.61% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 49.36%● | -2.50% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 20.74%● | 3.38% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 55.05%● | -0.94% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, AVGO or KMB?
- It depends on your goal. value: KMB (lower P/E); growth: AVGO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: KMB (higher dividend yield); quality: KMB (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, KMB leads 9 to 7.
- Is AVGO or KMB cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, KMB is cheaper: AVGO trades at a 63.68 P/E and KMB at 16.06.
- Which has grown faster, AVGO or KMB?
- Over the past five years, AVGO grew revenue faster — AVGO at a 24.17% CAGR versus KMB at -2.61%.
- Does AVGO or KMB pay a bigger dividend?
- AVGO yields 0.65% and KMB yields 4.97% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is AVGO or KMB more profitable?
- AVGO runs the higher net margin — AVGO at 38.85% versus KMB at 12.81%.
- Which has been the better investment, AVGO or KMB?
- Over the past 10-year, AVGO delivered the higher annualized total return — AVGO at 40.78% versus KMB at 1.05%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Broadcom P/E ratioKimberly-Clark P/E ratioBroadcom dividend yieldKimberly-Clark dividend yieldBroadcom ROEKimberly-Clark ROEBroadcom operating marginKimberly-Clark operating marginBroadcom revenue growthKimberly-Clark revenue growthBroadcom free cash flowKimberly-Clark free cash flow
Broadcom & Kimberly-Clark appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.