Which has the lower trailing P/E, AVGO or CELH?

AVGO has the lower trailing P/E: AVGO trades at 46.23 and CELH at 129.62. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, AVGO or CELH?

Over the past five years, CELH grew revenue faster — AVGO at a 27.42% CAGR versus CELH at 74.65%.

Does AVGO or CELH pay a bigger dividend?

AVGO pays a dividend (0.70% yield), while CELH has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is AVGO or CELH more profitable?

AVGO runs the higher net margin — AVGO at 42.94% versus CELH at 3.62%.

How have AVGO and CELH total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, AVGO delivered 40.00% and CELH delivered 44.18% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) vs Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH)

A side-by-side comparison of Broadcom Inc. and Celsius Holdings, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Different business models: AVGO is classified in Technology; CELH is classified in Consumer Defensive. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

AVGO

Broadcom Inc.

$1.72T

$361.99TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

CELH

Celsius Holdings, Inc.

$6.96B

$27.22Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — AVGO vs CELH

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

AVGO +2665.6% (+39.4%/yr)CELH +3844.9% (+44.4%/yr)CELH compounded faster over this window

AVGO CELH

AVGO vs CELH: by the numbers

•AVGO is the larger company ($1.72T vs $6.96B market cap).
•AVGO trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (46.23 vs 129.62 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•AVGO converts more revenue to profit (42.94% vs 3.62% net margin).
•CELH grew revenue faster over the past five years (74.65% vs 27.42% CAGR).
•AVGO pays a dividend (0.70% yield), while CELH has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	AVGO	CELH
P/E ratio	46.23	129.62
Forward P/E	31.04	N/A
P/S ratio	19.33	2.28
P/B ratio	17.28	2.35
EV / EBITDA	33.95	25.16
FCF yield	2.29%	6.65%

Profitability

Metric	AVGO	CELH
Gross margin	67.66%	48.76%
Operating margin	39.89%	18.63%
Net margin	42.94%	3.62%
ROE	38.38%	3.73%
ROIC	23.99%	5.33%

Dividends

Metric	AVGO	CELH
Dividend yield	0.70%	N/A
Payout ratio	32.44%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	AVGO	CELH
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	27.42%	74.65%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	49.36%	44.28%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	24.60%	152.98%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	51.48%	-2.24%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, AVGO or CELH?: AVGO has the lower trailing P/E: AVGO trades at 46.23 and CELH at 129.62. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, AVGO or CELH?: Over the past five years, CELH grew revenue faster — AVGO at a 27.42% CAGR versus CELH at 74.65%.
Does AVGO or CELH pay a bigger dividend?: AVGO pays a dividend (0.70% yield), while CELH has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is AVGO or CELH more profitable?: AVGO runs the higher net margin — AVGO at 42.94% versus CELH at 3.62%.
How have AVGO and CELH total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, AVGO delivered 40.00% and CELH delivered 44.18% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full AVGO analysis Full CELH analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Broadcom P/E ratio Celsius P/E ratio Broadcom dividend yield Broadcom ROE Celsius ROE Broadcom operating margin Celsius operating margin Broadcom revenue growth Celsius revenue growth Broadcom free cash flow Celsius free cash flow

Broadcom & Celsius appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.