Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) vs Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH)
A side-by-side comparison of Broadcom Inc. and Celsius Holdings, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 28, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Different business models: AVGO is classified in Technology; CELH is classified in Consumer Defensive. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
$380.91TechnologyDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
CELH
Celsius Holdings, Inc.
$29.45Consumer DefensiveDelayed quote: Jul 28, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — AVGO vs CELH
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 17yAVGO +33132.1%CELH +663.3%AVGO compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
AVGO CELH
AVGO vs CELH: by the numbers
- •AVGO is the larger company ($1.81T vs $7.53B market cap).
- •AVGO trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (63.87 vs 71.97 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •AVGO converts more revenue to profit (38.85% vs 5.85% net margin).
- •CELH grew revenue faster over the past five years (81.07% vs 24.17% CAGR).
- •AVGO pays a dividend (0.66% yield), while CELH has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | AVGO | CELH |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 63.87 | 71.97 |
| Forward P/E | 33.06 | N/A |
| P/S ratio | 24.76 | 2.52 |
| P/B ratio | 21.31 | 5.98 |
| PEG ratio | 0.26 | 1.63 |
| EV / EBITDA | 45.90 | 27.17 |
| FCF yield | 1.75% | 3.91% |
Profitability
| Metric | AVGO | CELH |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 66.96% | 49.62% |
| Operating margin | 43.66% | 18.63% |
| Net margin | 38.85% | 5.85% |
| ROE | 33.43% | 13.89% |
| ROIC | 16.36% | 10.01% |
Dividends
| Metric | AVGO | CELH |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.66% | N/A |
| Payout ratio | 51.73% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | AVGO | CELH |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 24.17% | 81.07% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 49.36% | 44.28% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 20.74% | 142.28% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 54.69% | 5.29% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, AVGO or CELH?
- AVGO has the lower trailing P/E: AVGO trades at 63.87 and CELH at 71.97. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, AVGO or CELH?
- Over the past five years, CELH grew revenue faster — AVGO at a 24.17% CAGR versus CELH at 81.07%.
- Does AVGO or CELH pay a bigger dividend?
- AVGO pays a dividend (0.66% yield), while CELH has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is AVGO or CELH more profitable?
- AVGO runs the higher net margin — AVGO at 38.85% versus CELH at 5.85%.
- How have AVGO and CELH total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, AVGO delivered 40.40% and CELH delivered 45.37% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Broadcom P/E ratioCelsius P/E ratioBroadcom dividend yieldCelsius dividend yieldBroadcom ROECelsius ROEBroadcom operating marginCelsius operating marginBroadcom revenue growthCelsius revenue growthBroadcom free cash flowCelsius free cash flow
Broadcom & Celsius appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 28, 2026.