ATIF Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (AUC) vs Hennessy Advisors, Inc. (HNNA)

Over the past 10 years, HNNA outperformed AUC — -2.87% vs -4.66% annualized total return (price plus dividends).

A side-by-side comparison of ATIF Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares and Hennessy Advisors, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total return — AUC vs HNNA

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y
AUC -37.9% (-4.7%/yr)HNNA -27.3% (-3.1%/yr)HNNA compounded faster over this window
406080100Start $10020182020202220242026$62$73
AUC HNNA

Metrics side by side

Did HNNA beat AUC?

Over the past 10 years, HNNA outperformed AUC — -2.87% vs -4.66% annualized total return (price plus dividends).

Total return (annualized)

MetricAUCHNNA
Total return (1Y)N/A1.66%
Total return CAGR (3Y)N/A23.62%
Total return CAGR (5Y)N/A6.70%
Total return CAGR (10Y)-4.66%-2.87%

AUC is an index fund, so valuation, profitability, and per-company growth metrics don't apply — the head-to-head here is total return (price plus reinvested dividends).

Frequently asked

Has HNNA beaten AUC?
Over the past 10 years, HNNA outperformed AUC — -2.87% vs -4.66% annualized total return (price plus dividends).

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.