Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) vs NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG)
ATO leads on 10 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Atmos Energy Corporation and NRG Energy, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 20, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — ATO vs NRG
growth of $100 · last 23yATO +587.0%NRG +1302.5%NRG compounded faster
ATO NRG
ATO vs NRG: by the numbers
- •NRG is the larger company ($28.50B vs $28.39B market cap).
- •ATO trades at the lower earnings multiple (20.92 vs 158.89 P/E).
- •ATO converts more revenue to profit (27.58% vs 0.74% net margin).
- •NRG grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.42% vs 8.80% CAGR).
- •ATO pays the higher dividend yield (2.27% vs 1.35%).
Which is better, ATO or NRG?
Metric tally: ATO 10 · NRG 5It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueATO(lower P/E)
GrowthNRG(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeATO(higher dividend yield)
QualityNRG(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ATO | NRG |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 20.92● | 158.89 |
| Forward P/E | 18.99 | — |
| P/S ratio | 5.85 | 0.87● |
| P/B ratio | 1.91● | 5.76 |
| PEG ratio | 2.18● | 10.97 |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.74● | 19.90 |
Profitability
| Metric | ATO | NRG |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 51.43%● | 17.07% |
| Operating margin | 35.87%● | 3.00% |
| Net margin | 27.58%● | 0.74% |
| ROE | 9.03%● | 4.90% |
| ROIC | 4.58% | 7.00%● |
Dividends
| Metric | ATO | NRG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.27%● | 1.35% |
| Payout ratio | 51.33% | 44.74% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ATO | NRG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 8.80% | 16.42%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 9.05% | 14.48%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 19.32%● | -13.77% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 14.49% | 33.27%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, ATO or NRG?
- It depends on your goal. value: ATO (lower P/E); growth: NRG (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: ATO (higher dividend yield); quality: NRG (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, ATO leads 10 to 5.
- Is ATO or NRG cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, ATO is cheaper: ATO trades at a 20.92 P/E and NRG at 158.89.
- Which has grown faster, ATO or NRG?
- Over the past five years, NRG grew revenue faster — ATO at a 8.80% CAGR versus NRG at 16.42%.
- Does ATO or NRG pay a bigger dividend?
- ATO yields 2.27% and NRG yields 1.35% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is ATO or NRG more profitable?
- ATO runs the higher net margin — ATO at 27.58% versus NRG at 0.74%.
- Which has been the better investment, ATO or NRG?
- Over the past 10-year, NRG delivered the higher annualized total return — ATO at 10.98% versus NRG at 27.69%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Atmos Energy P/E ratioNRG Energy P/E ratioAtmos Energy dividend yieldNRG Energy dividend yieldAtmos Energy ROENRG Energy ROEAtmos Energy operating marginNRG Energy operating marginAtmos Energy revenue growthNRG Energy revenue growthAtmos Energy free cash flowNRG Energy free cash flow
Atmos Energy & NRG Energy appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 20, 2026.