Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) vs FirstEnergy Corp. (FE)
ATO leads on 11 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Atmos Energy Corporation and FirstEnergy Corp. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — ATO vs FE
growth of $100 · last 30yATO +597.1%FE +124.0%ATO compounded faster
ATO FE
ATO vs FE: by the numbers
- •ATO is the larger company ($28.37B vs $27.20B market cap).
- •ATO trades at the lower earnings multiple (20.91 vs 25.63 P/E).
- •ATO converts more revenue to profit (27.58% vs 6.86% net margin).
- •ATO grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.80% vs 7.52% CAGR).
- •FE pays the higher dividend yield (3.83% vs 2.28%).
Which is better, ATO or FE?
Metric tally: ATO 11 · FE 5It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueATO(lower P/E)
GrowthATO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeFE(higher dividend yield)
QualityATO(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | ATO | FE |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 20.91● | 25.63 |
| Forward P/E | 18.97 | 15.97● |
| P/S ratio | 5.84 | 1.76● |
| P/B ratio | 1.91● | 2.16 |
| PEG ratio | 2.18● | 6.15 |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.73 | 12.32● |
| FCF yield | — | 6.58% |
Profitability
| Metric | ATO | FE |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 51.43% | 53.77%● |
| Operating margin | 35.87%● | 18.72% |
| Net margin | 27.58%● | 6.86% |
| ROE | 9.03%● | 8.42% |
| ROIC | 4.58%● | 4.46% |
Dividends
| Metric | ATO | FE |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.28% | 3.83%● |
| Payout ratio | 51.33% | 101.69% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ATO | FE |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 8.80%● | 7.52% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 9.05%● | -2.32% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 19.32%● | 7.07% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 13.57%● | 8.26% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, ATO or FE?
- It depends on your goal. value: ATO (lower P/E); growth: ATO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: FE (higher dividend yield); quality: ATO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, ATO leads 11 to 5.
- Is ATO or FE cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, ATO is cheaper: ATO trades at a 20.91 P/E and FE at 25.63.
- Which has grown faster, ATO or FE?
- Over the past five years, ATO grew revenue faster — ATO at a 8.80% CAGR versus FE at 7.52%.
- Does ATO or FE pay a bigger dividend?
- ATO yields 2.28% and FE yields 3.83% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is ATO or FE more profitable?
- ATO runs the higher net margin — ATO at 27.58% versus FE at 6.86%.
- Which has been the better investment, ATO or FE?
- Over the past 10-year, ATO delivered the higher annualized total return — ATO at 10.97% versus FE at 7.77%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Atmos Energy P/E ratioFirstEnergy P/E ratioAtmos Energy dividend yieldFirstEnergy dividend yieldAtmos Energy ROEFirstEnergy ROEAtmos Energy operating marginFirstEnergy operating marginAtmos Energy revenue growthFirstEnergy revenue growthAtmos Energy free cash flowFirstEnergy free cash flow
Atmos Energy & FirstEnergy appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.