Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) vs Eversource Energy (ES)
ES leads on 10 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Atmos Energy Corporation and Eversource Energy across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 17, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — ATO vs ES
growth of $100 · last 30yATO +592.4%ES +390.2%ATO compounded faster
ATO ES
ATO vs ES: by the numbers
- •ATO is the larger company ($28.31B vs $25.97B market cap).
- •ES trades at the lower earnings multiple (14.75 vs 20.86 P/E).
- •ATO converts more revenue to profit (27.58% vs 12.55% net margin).
- •ATO grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.80% vs 8.29% CAGR).
- •ES pays the higher dividend yield (4.46% vs 2.28%).
Which is better, ATO or ES?
Metric tally: ATO 6 · ES 10It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueES(lower P/E)
GrowthATO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeES(higher dividend yield)
QualityES(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ATO | ES |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 20.86 | 14.75● |
| Forward P/E | 18.93 | 13.99● |
| P/S ratio | 5.83 | 1.87● |
| P/B ratio | 1.91 | 1.57● |
| PEG ratio | 2.18 | 0.15● |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.71 | 9.95● |
| FCF yield | — | 0.91% |
Profitability
| Metric | ATO | ES |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 51.43%● | 39.87% |
| Operating margin | 35.87%● | 22.52% |
| Net margin | 27.58%● | 12.55% |
| ROE | 9.03% | 10.58%● |
| ROIC | 4.58% | 4.68%● |
Dividends
| Metric | ATO | ES |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.28% | 4.46%● |
| Payout ratio | 51.33% | 67.54% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ATO | ES |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 8.80%● | 8.29% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 9.05%● | 5.08% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 19.32% | 20.98%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 13.80%● | 0.38% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, ATO or ES?
- It depends on your goal. value: ES (lower P/E); growth: ATO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: ES (higher dividend yield); quality: ES (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, ES leads 10 to 6.
- Is ATO or ES cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, ES is cheaper: ATO trades at a 20.86 P/E and ES at 14.75.
- Which has grown faster, ATO or ES?
- Over the past five years, ATO grew revenue faster — ATO at a 8.80% CAGR versus ES at 8.29%.
- Does ATO or ES pay a bigger dividend?
- ATO yields 2.28% and ES yields 4.46% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is ATO or ES more profitable?
- ATO runs the higher net margin — ATO at 27.58% versus ES at 12.55%.
- Which has been the better investment, ATO or ES?
- Over the past 10-year, ATO delivered the higher annualized total return — ATO at 10.90% versus ES at 5.58%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Atmos Energy P/E ratioEversource Energy P/E ratioAtmos Energy dividend yieldEversource Energy dividend yieldAtmos Energy ROEEversource Energy ROEAtmos Energy operating marginEversource Energy operating marginAtmos Energy revenue growthEversource Energy revenue growthAtmos Energy free cash flowEversource Energy free cash flow
Atmos Energy & Eversource Energy appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 17, 2026.