Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) vs American Water Works Company, Inc. (AWK)
ATO leads on 9 of 13 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Atmos Energy Corporation and American Water Works Company, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
ATO
Atmos Energy Corporation
$169.96Utilities
AWK
American Water Works Company, Inc.
$126.31Utilities
Total return — ATO vs AWK
growth of $100 · last 18yATO +522.3%AWK +513.2%ATO compounded faster
ATO AWK
ATO vs AWK: by the numbers
- •ATO is the larger company ($28.37B vs $24.67B market cap).
- •ATO trades at the lower earnings multiple (20.91 vs 22.36 P/E).
- •ATO converts more revenue to profit (27.58% vs 21.17% net margin).
- •ATO grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.80% vs 6.38% CAGR).
- •AWK pays the higher dividend yield (2.67% vs 2.28%).
Which is better, ATO or AWK?
Metric tally: ATO 9 · AWK 4It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueATO(lower P/E)
GrowthATO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeAWK(higher dividend yield)
QualityATO(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ATO | AWK |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 20.91● | 22.36 |
| Forward P/E | 18.97 | 19.25 |
| P/S ratio | 5.84 | 4.73● |
| P/B ratio | 1.91● | 2.23 |
| PEG ratio | 2.18● | 3.98 |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.73 | 14.34● |
Profitability
| Metric | ATO | AWK |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 51.43%● | 43.55% |
| Operating margin | 35.87% | 36.48% |
| Net margin | 27.58%● | 21.17% |
| ROE | 9.03% | 9.98%● |
| ROIC | 4.58%● | 4.21% |
Dividends
| Metric | ATO | AWK |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.28% | 2.67%● |
| Payout ratio | 51.33% | 59.25% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ATO | AWK |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 8.80%● | 6.38% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 9.05%● | 7.78% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 19.32% | — |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 13.57%● | -2.64% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, ATO or AWK?
- It depends on your goal. value: ATO (lower P/E); growth: ATO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: AWK (higher dividend yield); quality: ATO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, ATO leads 9 to 4.
- Is ATO or AWK cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, ATO is cheaper: ATO trades at a 20.91 P/E and AWK at 22.36.
- Which has grown faster, ATO or AWK?
- Over the past five years, ATO grew revenue faster — ATO at a 8.80% CAGR versus AWK at 6.38%.
- Does ATO or AWK pay a bigger dividend?
- ATO yields 2.28% and AWK yields 2.67% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is ATO or AWK more profitable?
- ATO runs the higher net margin — ATO at 27.58% versus AWK at 21.17%.
- Which has been the better investment, ATO or AWK?
- Over the past 10-year, ATO delivered the higher annualized total return — ATO at 10.97% versus AWK at 7.08%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Atmos Energy P/E ratioAmerican Water Works P/E ratioAtmos Energy dividend yieldAmerican Water Works dividend yieldAtmos Energy ROEAmerican Water Works ROEAtmos Energy operating marginAmerican Water Works operating marginAtmos Energy revenue growthAmerican Water Works revenue growthAtmos Energy free cash flowAmerican Water Works free cash flow
Atmos Energy & American Water Works appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.