Ames National Corporation (ATLO) vs Franklin Financial Services Corporation (FRAF)
A side-by-side comparison of Ames National Corporation and Franklin Financial Services Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Total return — ATLO vs FRAF
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yATLO vs FRAF: by the numbers
- •ATLO is the larger company ($286M vs $286M market cap).
- •FRAF trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (11.58 vs 12.51 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •ATLO converts more revenue to profit (22.64% vs 18.24% net margin).
- •FRAF grew revenue faster over the past five years (17.02% vs 6.95% CAGR).
- •ATLO pays the higher dividend yield (2.88% vs 2.13%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ATLO | FRAF |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 12.51 | 11.58 |
| Forward P/E | 11.86 | 10.97 |
| PEG ratio | 16.24 | 1.15 |
| P/S ratio | 2.82 | 2.11 |
| P/B ratio | 1.34 | 1.55 |
Profitability
| Metric | ATLO | FRAF |
|---|---|---|
| Operating margin | 28.32% | 22.72% |
| Net margin | 22.64% | 18.24% |
| ROE | 10.78% | 13.41% |
Ames National Corporation: Gross margin is not shown for a lender or insurer: its revenue is interest, premiums and fees rather than the sale of goods, so there is no cost of goods sold to measure it against.
Franklin Financial Services Corporation: Gross margin is not shown for a lender or insurer: its revenue is interest, premiums and fees rather than the sale of goods, so there is no cost of goods sold to measure it against.
Dividends
| Metric | ATLO | FRAF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.88% | 2.13% |
| Payout ratio | 35.66% | 24.41% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ATLO | FRAF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 6.95% | 17.02% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 0.77% | 10.03% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 11.51% | 18.89% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, ATLO or FRAF?
- FRAF has the lower trailing P/E: ATLO trades at 12.51 and FRAF at 11.58. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, ATLO or FRAF?
- Over the past five years, FRAF grew revenue faster — ATLO at a 6.95% CAGR versus FRAF at 17.02%.
- Does ATLO or FRAF pay a bigger dividend?
- ATLO yields 2.88% and FRAF yields 2.13% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is ATLO or FRAF more profitable?
- ATLO runs the higher net margin — ATLO at 22.64% versus FRAF at 18.24%.
- How have ATLO and FRAF total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, ATLO delivered 5.91% and FRAF delivered 13.94% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Ames National & Franklin Financial Services appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.