Which has the lower trailing P/E, ATI or IR?

IR has the lower trailing P/E: ATI trades at 55.48 and IR at 29.57. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, ATI or IR?

Over the past five years, ATI grew revenue faster — ATI at a 11.07% CAGR versus IR at 9.56%.

Does ATI or IR pay a bigger dividend?

IR pays a dividend (0.11% yield), while ATI is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Is ATI or IR more profitable?

IR runs the higher net margin — ATI at 10.09% versus IR at 12.08%.

How have ATI and IR total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, ATI delivered 62.88% and IR delivered 6.03% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

ATI Inc. (ATI) vs Ingersoll Rand Inc. (IR)

A side-by-side comparison of ATI Inc. and Ingersoll Rand Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

ATI

ATI Inc.

$25.82B

$189.18IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 21, 2026, 10:15 AM EDT

Ingersoll Rand Inc.

$28.12B

$71.86IndustrialsDelayed quote: Sep 21, 2026, 10:15 AM EDT

Total return — ATI vs IR

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 9y

ATI +1135.4% (+32.2%/yr)IR +331.8% (+17.6%/yr)ATI compounded faster over this window

ATI IR

ATI vs IR: by the numbers

•IR is the larger company ($28.12B vs $25.82B market cap).
•IR trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (29.57 vs 55.48 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•IR converts more revenue to profit (12.08% vs 10.09% net margin).
•ATI grew revenue faster over the past five years (11.07% vs 9.56% CAGR).
•IR pays a dividend (0.11% yield), while ATI is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ATI	IR
P/E ratio	55.48	29.57
Forward P/E	37.44	20.27
P/S ratio	5.48	3.54
P/B ratio	13.76	2.76
EV / EBITDA	28.86	14.35
FCF yield	2.04%	4.34%

Profitability

Metric	ATI	IR
Gross margin	23.35%	37.94%
Operating margin	15.35%	21.52%
Net margin	10.09%	12.08%
ROE	25.35%	9.42%
ROIC	12.58%	8.36%

Dividends

Metric	ATI	IR
Dividend yield	N/A	0.11%
Payout ratio	N/A	3.29%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ATI	IR
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	11.07%	9.56%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	6.43%	11.01%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	43.10%	8.43%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	62.88%	6.03%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, ATI or IR?: IR has the lower trailing P/E: ATI trades at 55.48 and IR at 29.57. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, ATI or IR?: Over the past five years, ATI grew revenue faster — ATI at a 11.07% CAGR versus IR at 9.56%.
Does ATI or IR pay a bigger dividend?: IR pays a dividend (0.11% yield), while ATI is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is ATI or IR more profitable?: IR runs the higher net margin — ATI at 10.09% versus IR at 12.08%.
How have ATI and IR total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, ATI delivered 62.88% and IR delivered 6.03% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ATI analysis Full IR analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

ATI P/E ratio Ingersoll R P/E ratio Ingersoll R dividend yield ATI ROE Ingersoll R ROE ATI operating margin Ingersoll R operating margin ATI revenue growth Ingersoll R revenue growth ATI free cash flow Ingersoll R free cash flow

ATI & Ingersoll R appear in these rankings

Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.