Which has the lower trailing P/E, ATI or CW?

CW has the lower trailing P/E: ATI trades at 61.92 and CW at 53.35. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, ATI or CW?

Over the past five years, CW grew revenue faster — ATI at a 8.60% CAGR versus CW at 8.60%.

Does ATI or CW pay a bigger dividend?

CW pays a dividend (0.13% yield), while ATI is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Is ATI or CW more profitable?

CW runs the higher net margin — ATI at 9.26% versus CW at 14.17%.

How have ATI and CW total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, ATI delivered 26.50% and CW delivered 24.06% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

ATI Inc. (ATI) vs Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW)

A side-by-side comparison of ATI Inc. and Curtiss-Wright Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 29, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

ATI

ATI Inc.

$24.28B

$177.92IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 29, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Curtiss-Wright Corporation

$25.10B

$679.41IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 29, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — ATI vs CW

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 27y

ATI +1001.3%CW +9345.2%CW compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

ATI CW

ATI vs CW: by the numbers

•CW is the larger company ($25.10B vs $24.28B market cap).
•CW trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (53.35 vs 61.92 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•CW converts more revenue to profit (14.17% vs 9.26% net margin).
•CW pays a dividend (0.13% yield), while ATI is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ATI	CW
P/E ratio	61.92	53.35
Forward P/E	42.06	47.85
P/S ratio	5.67	7.49
P/B ratio	14.72	10.26
PEG ratio	11.26	1.94
EV / EBITDA	32.85	35.26
FCF yield	2.12%	2.19%

Profitability

Metric	ATI	CW
Gross margin	22.53%	37.17%
Operating margin	14.47%	18.48%
Net margin	9.26%	14.17%
ROE	24.03%	19.42%
ROIC	12.27%	12.41%

Dividends

Metric	ATI	CW
Dividend yield	N/A	0.13%
Payout ratio	N/A	7.57%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ATI	CW
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	8.60%	8.60%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	6.43%	21.79%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	73.92%	8.67%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	56.10%	44.45%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, ATI or CW?: CW has the lower trailing P/E: ATI trades at 61.92 and CW at 53.35. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, ATI or CW?: Over the past five years, CW grew revenue faster — ATI at a 8.60% CAGR versus CW at 8.60%.
Does ATI or CW pay a bigger dividend?: CW pays a dividend (0.13% yield), while ATI is a former payer with no current dividend run rate.
Is ATI or CW more profitable?: CW runs the higher net margin — ATI at 9.26% versus CW at 14.17%.
How have ATI and CW total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, ATI delivered 26.50% and CW delivered 24.06% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ATI analysis Full CW analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

ATI P/E ratio Curtiss-Wright P/E ratio ATI dividend yield Curtiss-Wright dividend yield ATI ROE Curtiss-Wright ROE ATI operating margin Curtiss-Wright operating margin ATI revenue growth Curtiss-Wright revenue growth ATI free cash flow Curtiss-Wright free cash flow

ATI & Curtiss-Wright appear in these rankings

Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 29, 2026.