Aterian, Inc. (ATER) vs Kandal M Venture Limited (FMFC)
Over the past year, ATER outperformed FMFC — -45.98% vs -98.94% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
A side-by-side comparison of Aterian, Inc. and Kandal M Venture Limited across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
Total return — ATER vs FMFC
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 1yMetrics side by side
Did ATER beat FMFC?
Over the past year, ATER outperformed FMFC — -45.98% vs -98.94% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Total return (annualized)
| Metric | ATER | FMFC |
|---|---|---|
| Total return (1Y) | -45.98% | -98.94% |
| Total return CAGR (3Y) | -44.45% | N/A |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -64.77% | N/A |
FMFC is an index fund, so valuation, profitability, and per-company growth metrics don't apply — the head-to-head here is total return (price plus reinvested dividends).
Frequently asked
- Has ATER beaten FMFC?
- Over the past year, ATER outperformed FMFC — -45.98% vs -98.94% annualized total return (price plus dividends).
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.