Which has the lower trailing P/E, ASX or UBER?

UBER has the lower trailing P/E: ASX trades at 55.19 and UBER at 14.97. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, ASX or UBER?

Over the past five years, UBER grew revenue faster — ASX at a 4.53% CAGR versus UBER at 33.95%.

Does ASX or UBER pay a bigger dividend?

ASX pays a dividend (0.85% yield), while UBER has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is ASX or UBER more profitable?

UBER runs the higher net margin — ASX at 8.52% versus UBER at 17.34%.

How have ASX and UBER total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, ASX delivered 49.75% and UBER delivered 7.68% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd. (ASX) vs Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER)

A side-by-side comparison of ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd. and Uber Technologies, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 4, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

ASX

ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.

$104.33B

$47.45TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

UBER

Uber Technologies, Inc.

$138.64B

$68.11TechnologyDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — ASX vs UBER

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 7y

ASX +1381.6% (+47.0%/yr)UBER +63.8% (+7.3%/yr)ASX compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

ASX UBER

ASX vs UBER: by the numbers

•UBER is the larger company ($138.64B vs $104.33B market cap).
•UBER trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (14.97 vs 55.19 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•UBER converts more revenue to profit (17.34% vs 8.52% net margin).
•UBER grew revenue faster over the past five years (33.95% vs 4.53% CAGR).
•ASX pays a dividend (0.85% yield), while UBER has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ASX	UBER
P/E ratio	55.19	14.97
Forward P/E	N/A	20.25
PEG ratio	9.91	N/A
P/S ratio	4.59	2.51
P/B ratio	8.55	5.08
EV / EBITDA	24.25	19.40
FCF yield	N/A	7.30%

Profitability

Metric	ASX	UBER
Gross margin	19.47%	42.31%
Operating margin	9.76%	12.47%
Net margin	8.52%	17.34%
ROE	15.88%	35.07%
ROIC	7.20%	13.01%

Dividends

Metric	ASX	UBER
Dividend yield	0.85%	N/A
Payout ratio	47.07%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ASX	UBER
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	4.53%	33.95%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	5.36%	N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)	49.75%	7.68%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, ASX or UBER?: UBER has the lower trailing P/E: ASX trades at 55.19 and UBER at 14.97. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, ASX or UBER?: Over the past five years, UBER grew revenue faster — ASX at a 4.53% CAGR versus UBER at 33.95%.
Does ASX or UBER pay a bigger dividend?: ASX pays a dividend (0.85% yield), while UBER has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is ASX or UBER more profitable?: UBER runs the higher net margin — ASX at 8.52% versus UBER at 17.34%.
How have ASX and UBER total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, ASX delivered 49.75% and UBER delivered 7.68% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ASX analysis Full UBER analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

ASE Technology Holding P/E ratio Uber Technologies P/E ratio ASE Technology Holding dividend yield ASE Technology Holding ROE Uber Technologies ROE ASE Technology Holding operating margin Uber Technologies operating margin ASE Technology Holding revenue growth Uber Technologies revenue growth ASE Technology Holding free cash flow Uber Technologies free cash flow

ASE Technology Holding & Uber Technologies appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 4, 2026.