ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd. (ASX) vs Celestica Inc. (CLS)
A side-by-side comparison of ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd. and Celestica Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 10, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
ASX
ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.
$39.47TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
CLS
Celestica Inc.
$346.55TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — ASX vs CLS
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yASX +985.1% (+26.9%/yr)CLS +2872.8% (+40.4%/yr)CLS compounded faster over this window
ASX CLS
ASX vs CLS: by the numbers
- •ASX is the larger company ($86.79B vs $39.85B market cap).
- •CLS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (35.99 vs 45.90 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •ASX converts more revenue to profit (8.52% vs 7.16% net margin).
- •CLS grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.80% vs 4.53% CAGR).
- •ASX pays a dividend (1.02% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ASX | CLS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 45.90 | 35.99 |
| Forward P/E | N/A | 30.38 |
| P/S ratio | 3.82 | 2.55 |
| P/B ratio | 7.11 | 16.07 |
| EV / EBITDA | 20.41 | 27.75 |
| FCF yield | N/A | 1.30% |
Profitability
| Metric | ASX | CLS |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 19.47% | 11.59% |
| Operating margin | 9.76% | 8.13% |
| Net margin | 8.52% | 7.16% |
| ROE | 15.88% | 45.07% |
| ROIC | 7.20% | 29.75% |
Dividends
| Metric | ASX | CLS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.02% | N/A |
| Payout ratio | 47.07% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ASX | CLS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 4.53% | 22.80% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 5.36% | 73.33% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -20.79% | 29.00% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 40.46% | 106.10% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, ASX or CLS?
- CLS has the lower trailing P/E: ASX trades at 45.90 and CLS at 35.99. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, ASX or CLS?
- Over the past five years, CLS grew revenue faster — ASX at a 4.53% CAGR versus CLS at 22.80%.
- Does ASX or CLS pay a bigger dividend?
- ASX pays a dividend (1.02% yield), while CLS has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is ASX or CLS more profitable?
- ASX runs the higher net margin — ASX at 8.52% versus CLS at 7.16%.
- How have ASX and CLS total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, ASX delivered 26.64% and CLS delivered 40.78% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
ASE Technology Holding P/E ratioCelestica P/E ratioASE Technology Holding dividend yieldASE Technology Holding ROECelestica ROEASE Technology Holding operating marginCelestica operating marginASE Technology Holding revenue growthCelestica revenue growthASE Technology Holding free cash flowCelestica free cash flow
ASE Technology Holding & Celestica appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 10, 2026.