Which has the lower trailing P/E, ASX or CDNS?

ASX has the lower trailing P/E: ASX trades at 42.97 and CDNS at 67.35. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, ASX or CDNS?

Over the past five years, CDNS grew revenue faster — ASX at a 4.53% CAGR versus CDNS at 15.04%.

Does ASX or CDNS pay a bigger dividend?

ASX pays a dividend (1.10% yield), while CDNS has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is ASX or CDNS more profitable?

CDNS runs the higher net margin — ASX at 8.52% versus CDNS at 23.61%.

How have ASX and CDNS total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, ASX delivered 25.35% and CDNS delivered 29.56% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd. (ASX) vs Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS)

A side-by-side comparison of ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd. and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 1, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

ASX

ASE Technology Holding Co., Ltd.

$81.25B

$36.95TechnologyAt close: Aug 31, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

CDNS

Cadence Design Systems, Inc.

$93.30B

$338.78TechnologyDelayed quote: Aug 31, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — ASX vs CDNS

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

ASX +859.3% (+25.4%/yr)CDNS +1232.2% (+29.6%/yr)CDNS compounded faster over this window

ASX CDNS

ASX vs CDNS: by the numbers

•CDNS is the larger company ($93.30B vs $81.25B market cap).
•ASX trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (42.97 vs 67.35 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•CDNS converts more revenue to profit (23.61% vs 8.52% net margin).
•CDNS grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.04% vs 4.53% CAGR).
•ASX pays a dividend (1.10% yield), while CDNS has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ASX	CDNS
P/E ratio	42.97	67.35
Forward P/E	N/A	41.61
P/S ratio	3.66	15.96
P/B ratio	6.82	13.58
EV / EBITDA	19.64	44.31
FCF yield	N/A	1.80%

Profitability

Metric	ASX	CDNS
Gross margin	19.47%	88.50%
Operating margin	9.76%	30.83%
Net margin	8.52%	23.61%
ROE	15.88%	20.09%
ROIC	7.20%	13.29%

Dividends

Metric	ASX	CDNS
Dividend yield	1.10%	N/A
Payout ratio	67.78%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ASX	CDNS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	4.53%	15.04%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	5.36%	13.62%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-20.79%	15.03%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	38.85%	15.69%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, ASX or CDNS?: ASX has the lower trailing P/E: ASX trades at 42.97 and CDNS at 67.35. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, ASX or CDNS?: Over the past five years, CDNS grew revenue faster — ASX at a 4.53% CAGR versus CDNS at 15.04%.
Does ASX or CDNS pay a bigger dividend?: ASX pays a dividend (1.10% yield), while CDNS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is ASX or CDNS more profitable?: CDNS runs the higher net margin — ASX at 8.52% versus CDNS at 23.61%.
How have ASX and CDNS total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, ASX delivered 25.35% and CDNS delivered 29.56% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ASX analysis Full CDNS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

ASE Technology Holding P/E ratio Cadence Design Systems P/E ratio ASE Technology Holding dividend yield ASE Technology Holding ROE Cadence Design Systems ROE ASE Technology Holding operating margin Cadence Design Systems operating margin ASE Technology Holding revenue growth Cadence Design Systems revenue growth ASE Technology Holding free cash flow Cadence Design Systems free cash flow

ASE Technology Holding & Cadence Design Systems appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 1, 2026.