Which has the lower trailing P/E, ASML or PLTR?

ASML has the lower trailing P/E: ASML trades at 52.55 and PLTR at 150.54. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, ASML or PLTR?

Over the past five years, PLTR grew revenue faster — ASML at a 15.77% CAGR versus PLTR at 35.90%.

Does ASML or PLTR pay a bigger dividend?

ASML pays a dividend (0.53% yield), while PLTR has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is ASML or PLTR more profitable?

PLTR runs the higher net margin — ASML at 30.10% versus PLTR at 49.00%.

How have ASML and PLTR total returns compared?

Over the past 5 years, ASML delivered 15.69% and PLTR delivered 44.77% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) vs Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR)

A side-by-side comparison of ASML Holding N.V. and Palantir Technologies Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

ASML

ASML Holding N.V.

$647.47B

$1,679.92TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 18, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

PLTR

Palantir Technologies Inc.

$407.87B

$177.64TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 18, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — ASML vs PLTR

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6y

ASML +394.2% (+30.5%/yr)PLTR +1660.3% (+61.3%/yr)PLTR compounded faster over this window

ASML PLTR

ASML vs PLTR: by the numbers

•ASML is the larger company ($647.47B vs $407.87B market cap).
•ASML trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (52.55 vs 150.54 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•PLTR converts more revenue to profit (49.00% vs 30.10% net margin).
•PLTR grew revenue faster over the past five years (35.90% vs 15.77% CAGR).
•ASML pays a dividend (0.53% yield), while PLTR has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ASML	PLTR
P/E ratio	52.55	150.54
Forward P/E	N/A	110.87
P/S ratio	15.79	66.26
P/B ratio	25.97	41.73
EV / EBITDA	40.82	152.50
FCF yield	1.82%	0.82%

Profitability

Metric	ASML	PLTR
Gross margin	52.72%	84.80%
Operating margin	35.41%	31.59%
Net margin	30.10%	49.00%
ROE	49.52%	30.86%
ROIC	37.49%	25.60%

Dividends

Metric	ASML	PLTR
Dividend yield	0.53%	N/A
Payout ratio	28.39%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ASML	PLTR
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	15.77%	35.90%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	24.63%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	9.33%	122.48%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	15.69%	44.77%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, ASML or PLTR?: ASML has the lower trailing P/E: ASML trades at 52.55 and PLTR at 150.54. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, ASML or PLTR?: Over the past five years, PLTR grew revenue faster — ASML at a 15.77% CAGR versus PLTR at 35.90%.
Does ASML or PLTR pay a bigger dividend?: ASML pays a dividend (0.53% yield), while PLTR has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is ASML or PLTR more profitable?: PLTR runs the higher net margin — ASML at 30.10% versus PLTR at 49.00%.
How have ASML and PLTR total returns compared?: Over the past 5 years, ASML delivered 15.69% and PLTR delivered 44.77% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ASML analysis Full PLTR analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

ASML P/E ratio Palantir Technologies P/E ratio ASML dividend yield ASML ROE Palantir Technologies ROE ASML operating margin Palantir Technologies operating margin ASML revenue growth Palantir Technologies revenue growth ASML free cash flow Palantir Technologies free cash flow

ASML & Palantir Technologies appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.