Which has the lower trailing P/E, ASML or PANW?

ASML has the lower trailing P/E: ASML trades at 52.55 and PANW at 826.32. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, ASML or PANW?

Over the past five years, PANW grew revenue faster — ASML at a 15.77% CAGR versus PANW at 21.95%.

Does ASML or PANW pay a bigger dividend?

ASML pays a dividend (0.53% yield), while PANW has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is ASML or PANW more profitable?

ASML runs the higher net margin — ASML at 30.10% versus PANW at 2.67%.

How have ASML and PANW total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, ASML delivered 33.74% and PANW delivered 29.94% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) vs Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW)

A side-by-side comparison of ASML Holding N.V. and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 13, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

ASML

ASML Holding N.V.

$647.47B

$1,679.92TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 18, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

PANW

Palo Alto Networks, Inc.

$296.32B

$363.58TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 18, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — ASML vs PANW

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

ASML +1653.2% (+33.2%/yr)PANW +1237.6% (+29.6%/yr)ASML compounded faster over this window

ASML PANW

ASML vs PANW: by the numbers

•ASML is the larger company ($647.47B vs $296.32B market cap).
•ASML trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (52.55 vs 826.32 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•ASML converts more revenue to profit (30.10% vs 2.67% net margin).
•PANW grew revenue faster over the past five years (21.95% vs 15.77% CAGR).
•ASML pays a dividend (0.53% yield), while PANW has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ASML	PANW
P/E ratio	52.55	826.32
P/S ratio	15.79	25.81
P/B ratio	25.97	10.78
EV / EBITDA	40.82	N/A
FCF yield	1.82%	N/A

Profitability

Metric	ASML	PANW
Gross margin	52.72%	70.36%
Operating margin	35.41%	6.05%
Net margin	30.10%	2.67%
ROE	49.52%	1.12%
ROIC	37.49%	1.03%

Dividends

Metric	ASML	PANW
Dividend yield	0.53%	N/A
Payout ratio	28.39%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ASML	PANW
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	15.77%	21.95%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	24.63%	N/A
FCF CAGR (5Y)	9.33%	25.30%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	15.69%	33.37%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, ASML or PANW?: ASML has the lower trailing P/E: ASML trades at 52.55 and PANW at 826.32. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, ASML or PANW?: Over the past five years, PANW grew revenue faster — ASML at a 15.77% CAGR versus PANW at 21.95%.
Does ASML or PANW pay a bigger dividend?: ASML pays a dividend (0.53% yield), while PANW has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is ASML or PANW more profitable?: ASML runs the higher net margin — ASML at 30.10% versus PANW at 2.67%.
How have ASML and PANW total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, ASML delivered 33.74% and PANW delivered 29.94% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ASML analysis Full PANW analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

ASML P/E ratio Palo Alto Networks P/E ratio ASML dividend yield ASML ROE Palo Alto Networks ROE ASML operating margin Palo Alto Networks operating margin ASML revenue growth Palo Alto Networks revenue growth ASML free cash flow Palo Alto Networks free cash flow

ASML & Palo Alto Networks appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 13, 2026.