ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) vs Micron Technology, Inc. (MU)
MU leads on 10 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of ASML Holding N.V. and Micron Technology, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 21, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — ASML vs MU
growth of $100 · last 30yASML +36726.0%MU +7965.4%ASML compounded faster
ASML MU
ASML vs MU: by the numbers
- •MU is the larger company ($1.28T vs $743.73B market cap).
- •MU trades at the lower earnings multiple (53.52 vs 63.76 P/E).
- •MU converts more revenue to profit (41.49% vs 29.71% net margin).
- •MU grew revenue faster over the past five years (20.34% vs 16.10% CAGR).
- •ASML pays the higher dividend yield (0.46% vs 0.04%).
Which is better, ASML or MU?
Metric tally: ASML 6 · MU 10It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueMU(lower P/E)
GrowthMU(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityASML(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ASML | MU |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 63.76 | 53.52● |
| Forward P/E | 44.43 | — |
| P/S ratio | 18.88● | 22.24 |
| P/B ratio | 30.93 | 17.84● |
| PEG ratio | 1.29 | 0.02● |
| EV / EBITDA | 47.28 | 34.76● |
| FCF yield | 1.36%● | 0.80% |
Profitability
| Metric | ASML | MU |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 52.60% | 58.44%● |
| Operating margin | 34.78% | 48.52%● |
| Net margin | 29.71% | 41.49%● |
| ROE | 48.67%● | 33.28% |
| ROIC | 35.54%● | 12.12% |
Dividends
| Metric | ASML | MU |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.46%● | 0.04% |
| Payout ratio | 30.25% | 6.47% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ASML | MU |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 16.10% | 20.34%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 24.63%● | 5.12% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 22.12% | 140.90%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 24.67% | 72.15%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, ASML or MU?
- It depends on your goal. value: MU (lower P/E); growth: MU (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: ASML (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MU leads 10 to 6.
- Is ASML or MU cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, MU is cheaper: ASML trades at a 63.76 P/E and MU at 53.52.
- Which has grown faster, ASML or MU?
- Over the past five years, MU grew revenue faster — ASML at a 16.10% CAGR versus MU at 20.34%.
- Does ASML or MU pay a bigger dividend?
- ASML yields 0.46% and MU yields 0.04% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is ASML or MU more profitable?
- MU runs the higher net margin — ASML at 29.71% versus MU at 41.49%.
- Which has been the better investment, ASML or MU?
- Over the past 10-year, MU delivered the higher annualized total return — ASML at 36.43% versus MU at 57.72%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
ASML P/E ratioMicron Technology P/E ratioASML dividend yieldMicron Technology dividend yieldASML ROEMicron Technology ROEASML operating marginMicron Technology operating marginASML revenue growthMicron Technology revenue growthASML free cash flowMicron Technology free cash flow
ASML & Micron Technology appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 21, 2026.