ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) vs Lam Research Corporation (LRCX)
ASML leads on 12 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of ASML Holding N.V. and Lam Research Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 21, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
ASML
ASML Holding N.V.
$1929.68Technology
LRCX
Lam Research Corporation
$389.04Technology
Total return — ASML vs LRCX
growth of $100 · last 30yASML +36726.0%LRCX +45225.8%LRCX compounded faster
ASML LRCX
ASML vs LRCX: by the numbers
- •ASML is the larger company ($743.73B vs $486.52B market cap).
- •ASML trades at the lower earnings multiple (63.76 vs 73.40 P/E).
- •LRCX converts more revenue to profit (30.94% vs 29.71% net margin).
- •ASML grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.10% vs 10.31% CAGR).
- •ASML pays the higher dividend yield (0.46% vs 0.27%).
Which is better, ASML or LRCX?
Metric tally: ASML 12 · LRCX 4It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueASML(lower P/E)
GrowthASML(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityASML(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ASML | LRCX |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 63.76● | 73.40 |
| Forward P/E | 44.43● | 48.39 |
| P/S ratio | 18.88● | 22.56 |
| P/B ratio | 30.93● | 46.21 |
| PEG ratio | 1.29 | 0.54● |
| EV / EBITDA | 47.28● | 61.10 |
| FCF yield | 1.36%● | 1.32% |
Profitability
| Metric | ASML | LRCX |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 52.60%● | 49.98% |
| Operating margin | 34.78% | 34.26% |
| Net margin | 29.71% | 30.94%● |
| ROE | 48.67% | 63.38%● |
| ROIC | 35.54%● | 34.00% |
Dividends
| Metric | ASML | LRCX |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.46%● | 0.27% |
| Payout ratio | 30.25% | 24.94% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ASML | LRCX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 16.10%● | 10.31% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 24.63%● | 21.72% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 22.12%● | 19.28% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 24.67% | 46.24%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, ASML or LRCX?
- It depends on your goal. value: ASML (lower P/E); growth: ASML (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: ASML (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, ASML leads 12 to 4.
- Is ASML or LRCX cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, ASML is cheaper: ASML trades at a 63.76 P/E and LRCX at 73.40.
- Which has grown faster, ASML or LRCX?
- Over the past five years, ASML grew revenue faster — ASML at a 16.10% CAGR versus LRCX at 10.31%.
- Does ASML or LRCX pay a bigger dividend?
- ASML yields 0.46% and LRCX yields 0.27% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is ASML or LRCX more profitable?
- LRCX runs the higher net margin — ASML at 29.71% versus LRCX at 30.94%.
- Which has been the better investment, ASML or LRCX?
- Over the past 10-year, LRCX delivered the higher annualized total return — ASML at 36.43% versus LRCX at 48.91%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
ASML P/E ratioLam Research P/E ratioASML dividend yieldLam Research dividend yieldASML ROELam Research ROEASML operating marginLam Research operating marginASML revenue growthLam Research revenue growthASML free cash flowLam Research free cash flow
ASML & Lam Research appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 21, 2026.