ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) vs Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO)
ASML leads on 9 of 17 compared metrics, though CSCO is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of ASML Holding N.V. and Cisco Systems, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 21, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — ASML vs CSCO
growth of $100 · last 30yASML +36726.0%CSCO +1954.0%ASML compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
ASML CSCO
ASML vs CSCO: by the numbers
- •ASML is the larger company ($743.73B vs $471.16B market cap).
- •CSCO trades at the lower earnings multiple (39.85 vs 63.76 P/E).
- •ASML converts more revenue to profit (29.71% vs 19.69% net margin).
- •ASML grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.10% vs 4.58% CAGR).
- •CSCO pays the higher dividend yield (1.38% vs 0.46%).
Which is better, ASML or CSCO?
Metric tally: ASML 9 · CSCO 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueCSCO(lower P/E)
GrowthASML(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeCSCO(higher dividend yield)
QualityASML(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ASML | CSCO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 63.76 | 39.85● |
| Forward P/E | 44.43 | 27.96● |
| P/S ratio | 18.88 | 7.85● |
| P/B ratio | 30.93 | 9.75● |
| PEG ratio | 1.29● | 68.42 |
| EV / EBITDA | 47.28 | 27.72● |
| FCF yield | 1.36% | 2.65%● |
Profitability
| Metric | ASML | CSCO |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 52.60% | 64.33%● |
| Operating margin | 34.78%● | 23.36% |
| Net margin | 29.71%● | 19.69% |
| ROE | 48.67%● | 24.47% |
| ROIC | 35.54%● | 11.66% |
Dividends
| Metric | ASML | CSCO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.46% | 1.38%● |
| Payout ratio | 30.25% | 64.45% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ASML | CSCO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 16.10%● | 4.58% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 24.63%● | -0.69% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 22.12%● | -2.45% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 24.67%● | 21.52% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, ASML or CSCO?
- It depends on your goal. value: CSCO (lower P/E); growth: ASML (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: CSCO (higher dividend yield); quality: ASML (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, ASML leads 9 to 8.
- Is ASML or CSCO cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, CSCO is cheaper: ASML trades at a 63.76 P/E and CSCO at 39.85.
- Which has grown faster, ASML or CSCO?
- Over the past five years, ASML grew revenue faster — ASML at a 16.10% CAGR versus CSCO at 4.58%.
- Does ASML or CSCO pay a bigger dividend?
- ASML yields 0.46% and CSCO yields 1.38% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is ASML or CSCO more profitable?
- ASML runs the higher net margin — ASML at 29.71% versus CSCO at 19.69%.
- Which has been the better investment, ASML or CSCO?
- Over the past 10-year, ASML delivered the higher annualized total return — ASML at 36.43% versus CSCO at 18.77%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
ASML P/E ratioCisco Systems P/E ratioASML dividend yieldCisco Systems dividend yieldASML ROECisco Systems ROEASML operating marginCisco Systems operating marginASML revenue growthCisco Systems revenue growthASML free cash flowCisco Systems free cash flow
ASML & Cisco Systems appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 21, 2026.