Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM) vs WD-40 Company (WDFC)

A side-by-side comparison of Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. and WD-40 Company across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 1, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Compare

Total returnASM vs WDFC

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y
ASM +256.1% (+13.5%/yr)WDFC +109.0% (+7.7%/yr)ASM compounded faster over this window
0100200300400500Start $10020182020202220242026$356$209
ASM WDFC

ASM vs WDFC: by the numbers

  • WDFC is the larger company ($2.87B vs $1.24B market cap).
  • ASM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (27.55 vs 32.55 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
  • ASM converts more revenue to profit (38.83% vs 13.22% net margin).
  • ASM grew revenue faster over the past five years (95.09% vs 6.85% CAGR).
  • WDFC pays a dividend (1.87% yield), while ASM has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

MetricASMWDFC
P/E ratio27.5532.55
Forward P/E21.6334.90
P/S ratio11.084.28
P/B ratio4.5310.36
EV / EBITDA21.0223.05
FCF yield1.35%2.75%

Profitability

MetricASMWDFC
Gross margin53.46%55.82%
Operating margin41.13%17.48%
Net margin38.83%13.22%
ROE15.89%32.01%
ROIC12.29%22.75%

Dividends

MetricASMWDFC
Dividend yieldN/A1.87%
Payout ratioN/A59.70%

Growth (annualized)

MetricASMWDFC
Revenue CAGR (5Y)95.09%6.85%
EPS CAGR (5Y)N/A8.73%
FCF CAGR (5Y)45.52%9.34%
Total return CAGR (5Y)48.24%-0.59%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, ASM or WDFC?
ASM has the lower trailing P/E: ASM trades at 27.55 and WDFC at 32.55. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, ASM or WDFC?
Over the past five years, ASM grew revenue faster — ASM at a 95.09% CAGR versus WDFC at 6.85%.
Does ASM or WDFC pay a bigger dividend?
WDFC pays a dividend (1.87% yield), while ASM has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is ASM or WDFC more profitable?
ASM runs the higher net margin — ASM at 38.83% versus WDFC at 13.22%.
How have ASM and WDFC total returns compared?
Over the past 10 years, ASM delivered 13.54% and WDFC delivered 7.78% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 1, 2026.