Which has the lower trailing P/E, ASM or NWPX?

NWPX has the lower trailing P/E: ASM trades at 21.26 and NWPX at 21.15. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, ASM or NWPX?

Over the past five years, ASM grew revenue faster — ASM at a 95.09% CAGR versus NWPX at 14.40%.

Is ASM or NWPX more profitable?

ASM runs the higher net margin — ASM at 38.83% versus NWPX at 8.49%.

How have ASM and NWPX total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, ASM delivered 11.73% and NWPX delivered 24.24% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM) vs NWPX Infrastructure, Inc. (NWPX)

A side-by-side comparison of Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. and NWPX Infrastructure, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

ASM

Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.

$959M

$5.64Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 2:20 PM EDT

NWPX

NWPX Infrastructure, Inc.

$1.02B

$105.52Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 2:15 PM EDT

Total return — ASM vs NWPX

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

ASM +203.3% (+11.7%/yr)NWPX +784.4% (+24.4%/yr)NWPX compounded faster over this window

ASM NWPX

ASM vs NWPX: by the numbers

•NWPX is the larger company ($1.02B vs $959M market cap).
•NWPX trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (21.15 vs 21.26 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•ASM converts more revenue to profit (38.83% vs 8.49% net margin).
•ASM grew revenue faster over the past five years (95.09% vs 14.40% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ASM	NWPX
P/E ratio	21.26	21.15
Forward P/E	16.33	19.45
PEG ratio	N/A	1.62
P/S ratio	8.29	1.77
P/B ratio	3.39	2.43
EV / EBITDA	15.10	12.71
FCF yield	1.80%	7.83%

Profitability

Metric	ASM	NWPX
Gross margin	53.46%	20.88%
Operating margin	41.13%	11.47%
Net margin	38.83%	8.49%
ROE	15.89%	11.65%
ROIC	12.29%	9.47%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ASM	NWPX
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	95.09%	14.40%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	13.17%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	N/A	32.18%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	47.30%	33.95%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, ASM or NWPX?: NWPX has the lower trailing P/E: ASM trades at 21.26 and NWPX at 21.15. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, ASM or NWPX?: Over the past five years, ASM grew revenue faster — ASM at a 95.09% CAGR versus NWPX at 14.40%.
Is ASM or NWPX more profitable?: ASM runs the higher net margin — ASM at 38.83% versus NWPX at 8.49%.
How have ASM and NWPX total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, ASM delivered 11.73% and NWPX delivered 24.24% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ASM analysis Full NWPX analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Avino Silver & Gold Mines P/E ratio NWPX Infrastructure P/E ratio Avino Silver & Gold Mines ROE NWPX Infrastructure ROE Avino Silver & Gold Mines operating margin NWPX Infrastructure operating margin Avino Silver & Gold Mines revenue growth NWPX Infrastructure revenue growth Avino Silver & Gold Mines free cash flow NWPX Infrastructure free cash flow

Avino Silver & Gold Mines & NWPX Infrastructure appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.