Which has the lower trailing P/E, ASM or CLS?

ASM has the lower trailing P/E: ASM trades at 24.49 and CLS at 35.99. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, ASM or CLS?

Over the past five years, ASM grew revenue faster — ASM at a 95.09% CAGR versus CLS at 22.80%.

Is ASM or CLS more profitable?

ASM runs the higher net margin — ASM at 38.83% versus CLS at 7.16%.

How have ASM and CLS total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, ASM delivered 12.41% and CLS delivered 40.78% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM) vs Celestica Inc. (CLS)

A side-by-side comparison of Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. and Celestica Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of September 10, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

Different business models: ASM is classified in Basic Materials; CLS is classified in Technology. Margin, capital intensity, and valuation differences should be interpreted in that sector context.

ASM

Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd.

$1.10B

$6.49Basic MaterialsDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

CLS

Celestica Inc.

$39.85B

$346.55TechnologyDelayed quote: Sep 11, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — ASM vs CLS

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

ASM +222.2% (+12.4%/yr)CLS +3063.6% (+41.3%/yr)CLS compounded faster over this window

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

ASM CLS

ASM vs CLS: by the numbers

•CLS is the larger company ($39.85B vs $1.10B market cap).
•ASM trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (24.49 vs 35.99 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•ASM converts more revenue to profit (38.83% vs 7.16% net margin).
•ASM grew revenue faster over the past five years (95.09% vs 22.80% CAGR).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ASM	CLS
P/E ratio	24.49	35.99
Forward P/E	19.23	30.38
P/S ratio	9.55	2.55
P/B ratio	3.91	16.07
EV / EBITDA	17.78	27.75
FCF yield	1.57%	1.30%

Profitability

Metric	ASM	CLS
Gross margin	53.46%	11.59%
Operating margin	41.13%	8.13%
Net margin	38.83%	7.16%
ROE	15.89%	45.07%
ROIC	12.29%	29.75%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ASM	CLS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	95.09%	22.80%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	73.33%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	45.52%	29.00%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	49.97%	106.10%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, ASM or CLS?: ASM has the lower trailing P/E: ASM trades at 24.49 and CLS at 35.99. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, ASM or CLS?: Over the past five years, ASM grew revenue faster — ASM at a 95.09% CAGR versus CLS at 22.80%.
Is ASM or CLS more profitable?: ASM runs the higher net margin — ASM at 38.83% versus CLS at 7.16%.
How have ASM and CLS total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, ASM delivered 12.41% and CLS delivered 40.78% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ASM analysis Full CLS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Avino Silver & Gold Mines P/E ratio Celestica P/E ratio Avino Silver & Gold Mines ROE Celestica ROE Avino Silver & Gold Mines operating margin Celestica operating margin Avino Silver & Gold Mines revenue growth Celestica revenue growth Avino Silver & Gold Mines free cash flow Celestica free cash flow

Avino Silver & Gold Mines & Celestica appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified September 10, 2026.