Artesian Resources Corporation (ARTNA) vs Pure Cycle Corporation (PCYO)
A side-by-side comparison of Artesian Resources Corporation and Pure Cycle Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
ARTNA
Artesian Resources Corporation
$33.69UtilitiesDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 2:39 PM EDT
PCYO
Pure Cycle Corporation
$10.97UtilitiesDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 2:39 PM EDT
Total return — ARTNA vs PCYO
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10yARTNA +60.5% (+4.8%/yr)PCYO +87.2% (+6.5%/yr)PCYO compounded faster over this window
ARTNA PCYO
ARTNA vs PCYO: by the numbers
- •ARTNA is the larger company ($348M vs $264M market cap).
- •ARTNA trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (14.71 vs 17.98 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •PCYO converts more revenue to profit (43.66% vs 20.18% net margin).
- •PCYO grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.63% vs 5.47% CAGR).
- •ARTNA pays a dividend (3.79% yield), while PCYO has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ARTNA | PCYO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 14.71 | 17.98 |
| Forward P/E | 14.84 | N/A |
| PEG ratio | 3.41 | 1.28 |
| P/S ratio | 2.97 | 7.84 |
| P/B ratio | 1.36 | 1.74 |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.18 | 18.40 |
| FCF yield | N/A | 1.82% |
Profitability
| Metric | ARTNA | PCYO |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 37.35% | 57.76% |
| Operating margin | 31.99% | 29.40% |
| Net margin | 20.18% | 43.66% |
| ROE | 9.21% | 9.71% |
| ROIC | 3.25% | 6.43% |
Dividends
| Metric | ARTNA | PCYO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.79% | N/A |
| Payout ratio | 55.33% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ARTNA | PCYO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 5.47% | 8.63% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 4.19% | 14.04% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | N/A | -21.13% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 0.41% | -4.87% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, ARTNA or PCYO?
- ARTNA has the lower trailing P/E: ARTNA trades at 14.71 and PCYO at 17.98. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, ARTNA or PCYO?
- Over the past five years, PCYO grew revenue faster — ARTNA at a 5.47% CAGR versus PCYO at 8.63%.
- Does ARTNA or PCYO pay a bigger dividend?
- ARTNA pays a dividend (3.79% yield), while PCYO has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is ARTNA or PCYO more profitable?
- PCYO runs the higher net margin — ARTNA at 20.18% versus PCYO at 43.66%.
- How have ARTNA and PCYO total returns compared?
- Over the past 10 years, ARTNA delivered 5.12% and PCYO delivered 6.49% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Artesian Resources P/E ratioPure Cycle P/E ratioArtesian Resources dividend yieldArtesian Resources ROEPure Cycle ROEArtesian Resources operating marginPure Cycle operating marginArtesian Resources revenue growthPure Cycle revenue growthArtesian Resources free cash flowPure Cycle free cash flow
Artesian Resources & Pure Cycle appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.