Arhaus, Inc. (ARHS) vs MillerKnoll, Inc. (MLKN)
A side-by-side comparison of Arhaus, Inc. and MillerKnoll, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
ARHS
Arhaus, Inc.
$10.15Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 12:55 PM EDT
MLKN
MillerKnoll, Inc.
$20.95Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 6, 2026, 12:50 PM EDT
Total return — ARHS vs MLKN
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 5yARHS -14.3% (-3.0%/yr)MLKN -40.0% (-9.7%/yr)ARHS compounded faster over this window
ARHS MLKN
ARHS vs MLKN: by the numbers
- •ARHS is the larger company ($1.44B vs $1.43B market cap).
- •MLKN trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (14.86 vs 20.47 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •ARHS converts more revenue to profit (4.02% vs 2.57% net margin).
- •ARHS grew revenue faster over the past five years (21.96% vs -0.67% CAGR).
- •MLKN pays the higher dividend yield (3.57% vs 3.46%).
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ARHS | MLKN |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 20.47 | 14.86 |
| Forward P/E | 19.01 | 10.38 |
| PEG ratio | 0.69 | N/A |
| P/S ratio | 0.83 | 0.37 |
| P/B ratio | 3.46 | 1.05 |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.18 | 5.29 |
| FCF yield | 2.85% | 8.09% |
Profitability
| Metric | ARHS | MLKN |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 39.09% | 39.57% |
| Operating margin | 5.53% | 5.51% |
| Net margin | 4.02% | 2.57% |
| ROE | 16.67% | 7.22% |
| ROIC | 6.79% | 4.77% |
Dividends
| Metric | ARHS | MLKN |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.46% | 3.57% |
| Payout ratio | 70.61% | 53.19% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ARHS | MLKN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 21.96% | -0.67% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 29.86% | N/A |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -25.73% | 3.42% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | N/A | -8.42% |
Some values include inputs from SEC filing.
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, ARHS or MLKN?
- MLKN has the lower trailing P/E: ARHS trades at 20.47 and MLKN at 14.86. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, ARHS or MLKN?
- Over the past five years, ARHS grew revenue faster — ARHS at a 21.96% CAGR versus MLKN at -0.67%.
- Does ARHS or MLKN pay a bigger dividend?
- ARHS yields 3.46% and MLKN yields 3.57% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is ARHS or MLKN more profitable?
- ARHS runs the higher net margin — ARHS at 4.02% versus MLKN at 2.57%.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Arhaus P/E ratioMillerKnoll P/E ratioArhaus dividend yieldMillerKnoll dividend yieldArhaus ROEMillerKnoll ROEArhaus operating marginMillerKnoll operating marginArhaus revenue growthMillerKnoll revenue growthArhaus free cash flowMillerKnoll free cash flow
Arhaus & MillerKnoll appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.