Arhaus, Inc. (ARHS) vs Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT)
A side-by-side comparison of Arhaus, Inc. and Liquidity Services, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 6, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.
ARHS
Arhaus, Inc.
$10.11Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 5, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
LQDT
Liquidity Services, Inc.
$43.22Consumer CyclicalDelayed quote: Oct 5, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — ARHS vs LQDT
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 5yARHS -14.3% (-3.0%/yr)LQDT +101.4% (+15.0%/yr)LQDT compounded faster over this window
ARHS LQDT
ARHS vs LQDT: by the numbers
- •ARHS is the larger company ($1.43B vs $1.35B market cap).
- •ARHS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (20.40 vs 42.37 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
- •LQDT converts more revenue to profit (6.79% vs 4.02% net margin).
- •ARHS grew revenue faster over the past five years (21.96% vs 15.03% CAGR).
- •ARHS pays a dividend (3.46% yield), while LQDT has no payments in the available dividend history.
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ARHS | LQDT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 20.40 | 42.37 |
| Forward P/E | 18.95 | 23.49 |
| PEG ratio | 0.68 | N/A |
| P/S ratio | 0.83 | 2.75 |
| P/B ratio | 3.45 | 5.71 |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.16 | 20.88 |
| FCF yield | 2.86% | 6.68% |
Profitability
| Metric | ARHS | LQDT |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 39.09% | 46.56% |
| Operating margin | 5.53% | 9.00% |
| Net margin | 4.02% | 6.79% |
| ROE | 16.67% | 14.10% |
| ROIC | 6.79% | 11.85% |
Dividends
| Metric | ARHS | LQDT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.46% | N/A |
| Payout ratio | 70.61% | N/A |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ARHS | LQDT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 21.96% | 15.03% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 29.86% | N/A |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -25.73% | 9.39% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | N/A | 14.55% |
Frequently asked
- Which has the lower trailing P/E, ARHS or LQDT?
- ARHS has the lower trailing P/E: ARHS trades at 20.40 and LQDT at 42.37. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
- Which has grown faster, ARHS or LQDT?
- Over the past five years, ARHS grew revenue faster — ARHS at a 21.96% CAGR versus LQDT at 15.03%.
- Does ARHS or LQDT pay a bigger dividend?
- ARHS pays a dividend (3.46% yield), while LQDT has no payments in the available dividend history.
- Is ARHS or LQDT more profitable?
- LQDT runs the higher net margin — ARHS at 4.02% versus LQDT at 6.79%.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Arhaus P/E ratioLiquidity Services P/E ratioArhaus dividend yieldArhaus ROELiquidity Services ROEArhaus operating marginLiquidity Services operating marginArhaus revenue growthLiquidity Services revenue growthArhaus free cash flowLiquidity Services free cash flow
Arhaus & Liquidity Services appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 6, 2026.